2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Hydraulic Fracture-Propagation Behavior in Presence of Natural Fractures: Fully Coupled Fractured-Reservoir Modeling in Poroelastic Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yu et al (2014) performed a sensitivity study of gas production for a shale gas well with different geometries of multiple transverse hydraulic fractures. Olson et al (2009) and Rahman and Rahman (2013) investigated fracture propagation behavior in the presence of natural fractures. Chen (2012) has applied the cohesive element method to modeling viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al (2014) performed a sensitivity study of gas production for a shale gas well with different geometries of multiple transverse hydraulic fractures. Olson et al (2009) and Rahman and Rahman (2013) investigated fracture propagation behavior in the presence of natural fractures. Chen (2012) has applied the cohesive element method to modeling viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models in early stages, such as the PK model [7], PKN model [8], KGD mode [9], pseudo-3D models, and planar-3D models [10,11], can only be used in simulating the propagation of fractures with highly idealized geometries. Some traditional methods, such as the finite difference method [12], finite element method [13], extended finite element method [14][15][16], discrete element method [17], have been used in the simulation of fracture network in recent years, but are computationally demanding and are ill-conditioned [17] for the fluid-rock coupling process of hydraulic fracturing. Different from these traditional methods, meshless methods [18][19][20] are free from meshing and with capability to deal with moving boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being different with the traditional methods, which need grid meshing for rock matrix, such as the finite difference method [15], the finite element method [16], the extended finite element method [17][18][19] the discrete element method [20,21], the cracking particles method [22,23], etc., the fractures are treated as the discontinuities of displacements, and grid meshing is needed only for fractures. Most of the problems mentioned above have been properly resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%