2005
DOI: 10.5006/1.3278205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of the Corrosion Properties of Ni-Cr-Mo-Gd Neutron-Absorbing Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particles dissolved preferentially in the hot concentrated brine leaving behind the more corrosion resistant Ni-Cr-Mo matrix. This phenomenon has been reported before [16]. It has also been reported that if a second consecutive scan is carried out using a pre-corroded Ni-Gd specimen, lower current densities will be measured for this second scan because the Ni 5 Gd particles already dissolved in the first scan and the remaining matrix is more resistant to polarization and corrosion [16].…”
Section: Anodic Potentiodynamic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The particles dissolved preferentially in the hot concentrated brine leaving behind the more corrosion resistant Ni-Cr-Mo matrix. This phenomenon has been reported before [16]. It has also been reported that if a second consecutive scan is carried out using a pre-corroded Ni-Gd specimen, lower current densities will be measured for this second scan because the Ni 5 Gd particles already dissolved in the first scan and the remaining matrix is more resistant to polarization and corrosion [16].…”
Section: Anodic Potentiodynamic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is possible that the corrosion rate of the secondary phase has a different corrosion rate dependence on environment than the base material. The corrosion rates obtained by LPR for Alloy 22 are about two orders of magnitude higher than the rates (slightly different environments) obtained by exposure testing for Alloy 22 (see Reference 19,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. One explanation for the discrepancies between the two measurement methods might be the higher rates for a material immediately following immersion.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2 The metallurgical development process and corrosion performance of this material has been reported previously. [3][4][5][6][7][8] This material has an austenitic microstructure with a eutectic second phase of the form Ni 5 Gd, which is called a gadolinide. The size, shape, and distribution of the gadolinide in the plate product are controlled by alloy chemistry, primary and secondary melting/refining, and thermomechanical processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the initial corrosion rate for the Ni-Cr-Mo-Gd material is determined by the very reactive gadolinide secondary phase. 31 This apparent general-corrosion rate was several orders-of-magnitude higher than for the 304B4, Grade A material. The secondary-phase (FeCr) 2 B of the borated stainless steel appears to be stable, likely due to the high Cr content; thus, it does not contribute to the corrosion directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%