1969
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.6.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of the Criticality of 20% Enriched Uranium Fast Critical Assemblies (FCA-I)

Abstract: A series of critical experiments and analyses have been made on cylindrical assemblies fueled with 20 % enriched uranium metal in the JAERI fast critical facility. The first assembly contains in the core 10.8 % of stainless steel and 6.5 % of void by γolume , and is provided with a natural uranium blanket 30 cm thick. Based on a number of correction experiments, the critical mass of the assembly was determined to be 94.9::tO.3 kg of 235U. With a reduced blanket thickness of 10 cm, the critical mass was found t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical assemblies had different names, different design approaches were applied, but, at the same time, all the test facilities embraced the same general idea -constructing universal instruments allowing simulating fast nuclear reactor cores with different geometries, nuclear fuel compositions, compositions and volume fractions of coolants, with internal and external nuclear fuel breeding blankets at minimum financial and time expenditures. Such test facilities were constructed in the USA (ZPR, ZPPR) (Ishikawa and McKnight 2013;Lell et al 2013), in the USSR (BFS, KOBRA) (Leypunsky et al 1974;Rozhikhin and Semenov 2013), in France (MA-ZURKA) (Bouget et al 1980), in Germany (SNEAK) (Bickel et al 1965), in Japan (FCA) (Hirota et al 1969), and in the Great Britain (ZEBRA) (Rowlands and Zukeran 2013). The main purpose of such test facilities was to allow creating the model of the reactor under design and obtaining, using the model, experimental values, comparison of which with calculated values allowed drawing certain conclusions with regard to the reliability and uncertainties of the design values of neutronics parameters of the modeled reactor design and entering appropriate corrections of these values in timely manner if the necessity emerged.…”
Section: The Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical assemblies had different names, different design approaches were applied, but, at the same time, all the test facilities embraced the same general idea -constructing universal instruments allowing simulating fast nuclear reactor cores with different geometries, nuclear fuel compositions, compositions and volume fractions of coolants, with internal and external nuclear fuel breeding blankets at minimum financial and time expenditures. Such test facilities were constructed in the USA (ZPR, ZPPR) (Ishikawa and McKnight 2013;Lell et al 2013), in the USSR (BFS, KOBRA) (Leypunsky et al 1974;Rozhikhin and Semenov 2013), in France (MA-ZURKA) (Bouget et al 1980), in Germany (SNEAK) (Bickel et al 1965), in Japan (FCA) (Hirota et al 1969), and in the Great Britain (ZEBRA) (Rowlands and Zukeran 2013). The main purpose of such test facilities was to allow creating the model of the reactor under design and obtaining, using the model, experimental values, comparison of which with calculated values allowed drawing certain conclusions with regard to the reliability and uncertainties of the design values of neutronics parameters of the modeled reactor design and entering appropriate corrections of these values in timely manner if the necessity emerged.…”
Section: The Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%