Reactions of 1 and 2 with MAO and MMAO were monitored by EPR. It was found that MMAO is a stronger reducing agent than MAO. 1 is more prone to reduction than 2. The reduction of ZrIV to ZrIII seems to be the essential pathway of some zirconocene catalysts' deactivation. ZrIII species with the following proposed structures can be identified in the 1/MMAO system: (2‐PhInd)2ZrIII(iBu), (2‐PhInd)2ZrIII(µ‐Cl)2AliBu2, (2‐PhInd)2ZrIII(µ‐Cl)(iBu)AliBu2, and [(2‐PhInd)2ZrIII]+[Me‐MAO]−. The degree of reduction of ZrIV species determined by EPR in the catalytic system 2/MMAO can be masked by the formation of diamagnetic ZrIII/ZrIII dimers. Addition of monomers to the 2/MAO system promotes reduction ot the zirconium species.magnified image