2017
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa7e8e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of the pedestal structure and inter-ELM pedestal evolution in JET with the ITER-like wall

Abstract: The pedestal structure of type I ELMy H-modes has been analysed for JET-ILW. The electron pressure pedestal width is independent of ρ* and increases proportionally to √β pol,PED. Additional broadening of the width is observed, at constant β pol,PED , with increasing ν* and/or neutral gas injection and the contribution of atomic physics effects in setting the pedestal width cannot as yet be ruled out. Neutral penetration alone does not determine the shape of the edge density profile in JET-ILW. The ratio of ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, variations in D have been experimentally observed in several machines with D≈0.084 in Alcator C-mod [50] to D≈0.1 in AUG [62] and JT-60U [63,64,65] and D≈0.06-0.13 TCV [29]. Specifically for JET-ILW, a large variation has been observed, with D≈0.06-0.13 [53,59]. So a large part of JET-ILW pedestal width cannot be predicted with the standard EPED1 model.…”
Section: The Pb Model and The Eped Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, variations in D have been experimentally observed in several machines with D≈0.084 in Alcator C-mod [50] to D≈0.1 in AUG [62] and JT-60U [63,64,65] and D≈0.06-0.13 TCV [29]. Specifically for JET-ILW, a large variation has been observed, with D≈0.06-0.13 [53,59]. So a large part of JET-ILW pedestal width cannot be predicted with the standard EPED1 model.…”
Section: The Pb Model and The Eped Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two term scalings, separating core and pedestal thermal confinement in the H-mode, have been reported to have a very strong pedestal scaling τ E,ped ∝ A 0.96 and a weak negative dependence of the plasma core confinement τ E,core ∝ A −0.16 (Cordey et al 1999). Here, τ E,ped = W ped /P loss , with W ped = 1.5(n e ped T e ped + n i ped T i ped )V top where subscript ped refers to the values at the pedestal top, which is typically 1-3 cm inward from the LCFS in JET (Maggi et al 2017), V top ≈ V is the volume inside the flux surface defined by the pedestal top and V the total plasma volume. The core confinement time is defined as τ E,core = τ E − τ E,ped .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,[46][47][48]). On JET, the EPED model works quite well at low gas fuelling, but not so well at high gas rates [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The search for the PB modes has also motivated the study of electromagnetic fluctuation activity arising near the plasma periphery prior to ELMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%