2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.97.103013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of the structure of massive hybrid stars within a modified NJL model

Abstract: In this paper, we use the equation of state based on a modification of 2+1 flavors Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model to study the quark matter of hybrid stars. For comparison, we utilize five EOSs of the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model to describe the hadronic phase. With the 3window crossover interpolation approach, we try to construct relatively soft hybrid EOSs but find the maximum masses of hybrid stars do not differ too much. The results are quite close to two solar mass, which is consistent with the mas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27][28] or phenomenological approaches, such as bag models, Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL)-type models or the quark-meson coupling model in mean field approximation have been employed to describe quark matter in this intermediate density regime, e.g. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Some models include constraints from lattice calculations, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28] or phenomenological approaches, such as bag models, Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL)-type models or the quark-meson coupling model in mean field approximation have been employed to describe quark matter in this intermediate density regime, e.g. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Some models include constraints from lattice calculations, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 in [9] and [8,17,19,34,35,39,40,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. Reason (ii) could be related to first-order phase transitions [38,44,52,[74][75][76][77][78] or an "unphase transition", as predicted by the quarkionic model [35,40,42,48,79,80] or crossover transitions/Gibbs constructions to/with (stiff) quark matter [36,37,45,51,[81][82][83]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say a constant G does not meet these requirements. In [19] they investigate how to extract the feedback of quark from gluon propagator and get Eq.4.The parameter set used in this paper is m = 5.6MeV , Λ = 587.9MeV , G 1 = 5.564 × 10 −6 MeV −2 and G 2 = −3.16 × 10 −14 MeV −5 , which is proved to be successful in fitting the quark condensate to the Lattice results at finite temperature [20].…”
Section: Moments By Njl Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%