1938
DOI: 10.2307/4582639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Chronic Brucellosis: IV. An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Laboratory Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1939
1939
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation has been said to be particularly common in chronic brucellosis (20)(21)(22)(23). One might explain its occurrence by localization or sequestration of the Brucella in an avascular focus (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation has been said to be particularly common in chronic brucellosis (20)(21)(22)(23). One might explain its occurrence by localization or sequestration of the Brucella in an avascular focus (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, unlike the Mantoux test, a negative result cannot be taken to preclude the diagnosis. Evans et al (1938). found that the skin test was negative in 39% of affected patients.…”
Section: Case Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct agglutination test has been generally agreed to be the most useful laboratory aid when cultures are negative (Evans, Robinson & Baumgartner, 1938; Spink, 1956;Dalrymple-Champneys, 1960; Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis, 1964), but unfortunately it has its limitations and its interpretation is not universally agreed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%