2016
DOI: 10.5958/0976-4623.2016.00014.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Combining Ability Through Line x Tester Analysis in Garden Pea(PIsum SativumL.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they propose that plant breeders should strategically plan forthcoming breeding work to achieve high yields in field pea cultivation. Similar observations and recommendations have been supported by Ceyhan et al [32], Kumar et al [33] and Kumar et al [34] for field pea. Certain findings might support the possibility of determining these traits through the hybridization of particular parents.…”
Section: Per Se Performance Of Parents and Their Crossessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, they propose that plant breeders should strategically plan forthcoming breeding work to achieve high yields in field pea cultivation. Similar observations and recommendations have been supported by Ceyhan et al [32], Kumar et al [33] and Kumar et al [34] for field pea. Certain findings might support the possibility of determining these traits through the hybridization of particular parents.…”
Section: Per Se Performance Of Parents and Their Crossessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ten out of the 12 crosses showed signifcant positive MP heterosis and 10 crosses for BP heterosis. Similar magnitude of heterosis was also reported by [13,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39].Te best crosses, which were classifed on the basis of heterosis parameters, showed that two out of the 12 studied crosses were derived from P 4 (Line 4.1.18) as male or female parent that was classifed as a good performance for plant height, no. of pods/plant, average weight of pod, total fresh pods, weight of small pods/plot, pods length, pods diameter, and weight of medium pods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Higher estimation of dominance variance (σ 2 SCA) was observed as compared to additive variance (σ 2 GCA) for all the characters except days to 50% tasseling (Table 1) probably due to predominance of non-additive gene action, suggesting the scope of improvement of these characters through heterosis breeding. Similar nonadditive gene action was also reported by Suneetha et al, (2000) for days to 50 per cent tasseling and days to 50 per cent silking, Kanagarasu et al, (2010) and Kumar et al, (2014) for grain yield, cob length, plant height, ear height, 1000 grain weight, grain rows per cob, days to 50 percent tassel and days to 50 percent silk and Ali et al, (2012) for number of grain rows per cob and 100-grain weight, Kumar et al, (2012) and Ahmed et al, (2015) for plant height, days to 50 % tasseling, days to 50 % silking, cob length, cob girth, number of grain rows per cob, number of grains per row, 1000-grain weight and grain yield in maize in their study. Singh and Singh (1998) also reported non-additive gene action for plant height, ear length, kernel rows, 1000 grain weight and yield in maize.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%