The development of high-lysine maize has raised wide interest. This paper considers the possible value of a high-lysine barley for animal feeding if resources were used successfully in developing one.A least-cost mixture for young bacon pigs had lysine as one cost-limiting factor when computed so that the quantity containing 70 Ib 'total digestible nutrients' also contained at least 0.69 lb Ca, 0.51 Ib P, 17 Ib protein, 0.82 lb lysine, o.571h 'methionine+cystine', 0.66 lb isoleucine and fixed levels of six further amino acids. T h e following ingredients (with prices, &'ton) were used in this calculation : standard barley (22 for UK or 30 for EEC countries), fish meal (72)' soya meal (M), DL-rnethionine (~oo), L-lysine hydrochloride (560, a likely future price), CaCO, (a) and CaHPO, (44). Opportunity prices (i.e. maximum prices for additional ingredients at which they would be brought into the least-cost formula) were then computed for barleys of different composition. Expressed as percentages of the price of standard barley (117; of protein containing 3'4% lysine), they are: Standard barley at Ezzlton Standard barley at A30/ton 105 107 rog 122 IOI 102 104 112Calculations for a 14% protein mix for older pigs, with individual amino acids reduced in proportion, gave essentially the same results; nor were they changed significantly by removing the specification for total protein content. Including synthetic L-lysine hydrochloride at its current price of Lgoojton changed results by no more than z percentage units.Normally, high-protein barleys have a lower lysine (expressed as % of protein).If a realistic target for a high-lysine barley were I 5 7;) of protein, still containing 4% lysine, our type of calculation indicates that for use in pig rations it could conirnand a price pr-mium of not more than 9% in the UK over standard barley.