1990
DOI: 10.1039/an9901500085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on inorganic ion exchangers. Part 5. Preparation, properties and application of antimony(III) arsenate and antimony(III) molybdate

Abstract: Two inorganic ion-exchange materials, antimony(ll1) arsenate and antimony(ll1) molybdate, have been synthesised and characterised. The distribution coefficients of 12 metal ions in de-mineralised water were determined. The order of selectivity was found to be

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is curious given the much greater solubility of potassium antimonyl tartrate in pure water than in combined reagent solutions. In seems likely that the insoluble species being formed is in fact a salt of Sb(III) and molybdate [127] which forms at low [Mo(VI)]/[Sb(III)] ratios, rather than a basic salt as suggested by Murphy and Riley [85]. If a salt of Sb(III) and molybdate is responsible for the Sb(III) solubility issues, it is expected that pH manipulation will be ineffective in dissolving it [127]; dilution should be the preferred course of action.…”
Section: Methods Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is curious given the much greater solubility of potassium antimonyl tartrate in pure water than in combined reagent solutions. In seems likely that the insoluble species being formed is in fact a salt of Sb(III) and molybdate [127] which forms at low [Mo(VI)]/[Sb(III)] ratios, rather than a basic salt as suggested by Murphy and Riley [85]. If a salt of Sb(III) and molybdate is responsible for the Sb(III) solubility issues, it is expected that pH manipulation will be ineffective in dissolving it [127]; dilution should be the preferred course of action.…”
Section: Methods Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of arsenic or mercury in food and water above a certain level is a serious threat to public health, and therefore it is very essential to develop fast, sensitive, and selective analytical methods for their detection. Various methods including hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, fluorescence spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrometry, etc., have been used for the detection of arsenic and mercury. Although these methods are successful in detecting arsenic and mercury at subpicogram to subnanogram levels, they require expensive instruments, laboratory setup, and high operating cost . The low-cost electrochemical methods, particularly stripping voltammetry, have attracted significant interest for their excellent sensitivity and unique ability to detect the trace levels of elements in distinct oxidation states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of polyvalent metals such as Th, Ce, Sb, Ti, Sn, Zr, Fe, Bi, Pb, Al etc. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . These exhibit high affinity and selectivity for specific metal ion that made them a prominent tool for separation of that metal ion, in the presence of other competing metal ions with lesser affinity for the exchanger under study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%