2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15249652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Methane Gas Hydrate Formation Kinetics Enhanced by Isopentane and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Promoters for Seawater Desalination

Abstract: Methane hydrate applications in gas storage and desalination have attracted increasing attention in recent years. In the present work, the effect of isopentane (IP), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and IP/SDS blends as promoters on methane hydrate formation kinetics, in terms of the pressure–temperature (P‒T) profile, gas uptake, hydrate induction time (HIT), and water-to-hydrate conversion ratio (WHCR), were studied for distilled water and seawater samples with an IP/water sample ratio of 3:10 (by volume) and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the temperature interval of 273.65-275.15 K, the gas consumption obtained for sodium surfactin was quite similar to those obtained for rhamnolipids and sodium dodecyl sulfate for concentrations at 1500, 2000, and 2500 ppm, herein the additives played the role of methane hydrate promoters. The additives were confirmed to reduce the interfacial surface tension; accordingly, the methane solubility in the liquid phase was improving, and a high amount of dissolved methane in the liquid phase was able to subsequently occupy cage structures formed by water [52,59].…”
Section: Gas Uptakementioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the temperature interval of 273.65-275.15 K, the gas consumption obtained for sodium surfactin was quite similar to those obtained for rhamnolipids and sodium dodecyl sulfate for concentrations at 1500, 2000, and 2500 ppm, herein the additives played the role of methane hydrate promoters. The additives were confirmed to reduce the interfacial surface tension; accordingly, the methane solubility in the liquid phase was improving, and a high amount of dissolved methane in the liquid phase was able to subsequently occupy cage structures formed by water [52,59].…”
Section: Gas Uptakementioning
confidence: 96%
“…This methodology, which provides information over a large range of molecular to macroscopic scales, is implemented with two prototypical surfactant promoters, SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) and AOT (dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt or AerosolOcTyl). SDS is a benchmark promoter, to which other surfactant promoters are usually compared; ,, it is often used in combination with other additives, including thermodynamic promoters, , solid porous or nonporous particles, or soil organic matter …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proved that the formation and dissociation process of a hydrate is simple; there is almost no mass loss, no environmental protection problem, and the gas storage capacity is large [1,2]. Therefore, hydrate-based technologies have shown great application potential in cold storage [3][4][5][6], gas separation [7,8], storage and transport of gases [9,10], and seawater desalination [11,12], etc. However, the characteristics of poor gas-liquid interface, the randomness of nucleation, the low rate of nucleation, and crystal growth are the key problems that restrict the fast formation of hydrate and its technology application to energy storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%