1972
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600025909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population

Abstract: Two experiments are described in which the possible yield benefits of mixing maize and beans were examined under intensive farming conditions. A 'replacement series' of pure maize, two-thirds maize/one-third beans, one-third maize/two-thirds beans and pure beans was used at four plant populations. A high level of nitrogen was applied on the maize to eliminate the effects of nitrogen transfer from the beans.Yields of the mixtures were up to 38 % higher than could be achieved by growing the crops separately. It … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
194
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
194
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Intercropping has also been shown to: (i) improve soil conservation (Anil et al 1998), (ii) favour weed control (Banik et al 2006;Corre-Hellou et al 2011), (iii) reduce pests and diseases (Trenbath 1993;Altieri 1999;Hauggaard-Nielsen et al 2007;Corre-Hellou and Crozat 2005;Ratnadass et al 2012) and (iv) provide better lodging resistance (Anil et al 1998). Hauggaard-Nielsen et al (2007);(2001a, 2001b; Knudsen et al (2004) and Naudin et al (2009) HW durum wheat, SW soft wheat, B barley, F faba bean, P pea, NO no N-fertilization N organic N-fertilization Willey and Osiru (1972):…”
Section: Advantages Expected By Cereal/legume Intercroppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intercropping has also been shown to: (i) improve soil conservation (Anil et al 1998), (ii) favour weed control (Banik et al 2006;Corre-Hellou et al 2011), (iii) reduce pests and diseases (Trenbath 1993;Altieri 1999;Hauggaard-Nielsen et al 2007;Corre-Hellou and Crozat 2005;Ratnadass et al 2012) and (iv) provide better lodging resistance (Anil et al 1998). Hauggaard-Nielsen et al (2007);(2001a, 2001b; Knudsen et al (2004) and Naudin et al (2009) HW durum wheat, SW soft wheat, B barley, F faba bean, P pea, NO no N-fertilization N organic N-fertilization Willey and Osiru (1972):…”
Section: Advantages Expected By Cereal/legume Intercroppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of intercropping and the effect of competition between the two species used in a mixture were calculated using different competition indices. The land equivalent ratio (LER) was used as the criterion for mixed stand advantage as both vetch and cereal were desired species [31]. In particular, LER indicates the efficiency of intercropping for using the resources of the environment compared with monocropping [32].…”
Section: Competitions Indices and Monetary Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an indicator of complementarity. The LER was calculated as [16]. The interpretation of ATER involves that ATER>1 implies yield advantage;…”
Section: Data Measurements and Collectedmentioning
confidence: 99%