1977
DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.31b-0546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Autoxidation of t-Butyl-substituted Phenols in Alkaline Media. 2. Reactions of 4,6-Di-t-butylguaiacol and Related Compounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is surprising in view of the great extent of ring opening observed when phenolic structures are reacted with molecular oxygen, which is a considerably weaker oxidant (Eckert et al 1973, Gierer andImsgard 1977). The reason for this discrepancy is currently being studied in this laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…This result is surprising in view of the great extent of ring opening observed when phenolic structures are reacted with molecular oxygen, which is a considerably weaker oxidant (Eckert et al 1973, Gierer andImsgard 1977). The reason for this discrepancy is currently being studied in this laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…There are no simple mechanisms that would justify such reorganization, but a similar conversion is precedented by the outcome of base-mediated autoxidation of 4,6-di- tert -butylguaiacol . In analogy with this work, we consider the intermediacy of a dioxetane that decays to an epoxide, opening of which would provide the “driving” force for migration of the tert -butyl group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photooxidation of 3,5-di-t-butyl catechol 5a in polar solvents such as methanol, acetone or aceto-$Treatment of 4a with Na,CO, at room temperature gives a new product. Although we did not investigate this reaction in detail, we assign the epoxide structure 6 based on ' H NMR and comparison with analogous products reported in the literature (Gierer and Imsgard, 1977a, 1977b, Wilson et al, 1982. 'H NMR: 6.83 (d, J = 1 Hz, lH), 3.78 (d, J = 1 Hz, lH), 1.15 (s, 9H), 1.01 (s, 9H).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%