1967
DOI: 10.1080/04345546709415447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Efficiency of Collecting and Counting Anopheles Gambiae in Verandah-Trap Huts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numbers of mosquitoes indoors are determined by the numbers of dead indoors plus a daytime count of numbers resting indoors. The latter is only 60% efficient (Smith & Esozed, 1966), but the undercount leads to less than a 10% error in the calculation of egress of A. gambiae from an untreated hut, as in the example given in Table XIV, and a 2-3 % error in the calculation of egress of A. gambiae from a DDT-treated hut. The small error in the treated hut is because a smaller proportion of the total mosquitoes rest indoors in the treated than in the untreated hut.…”
Section: Deterrent Effect Of Ddtmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The numbers of mosquitoes indoors are determined by the numbers of dead indoors plus a daytime count of numbers resting indoors. The latter is only 60% efficient (Smith & Esozed, 1966), but the undercount leads to less than a 10% error in the calculation of egress of A. gambiae from an untreated hut, as in the example given in Table XIV, and a 2-3 % error in the calculation of egress of A. gambiae from a DDT-treated hut. The small error in the treated hut is because a smaller proportion of the total mosquitoes rest indoors in the treated than in the untreated hut.…”
Section: Deterrent Effect Of Ddtmentioning
confidence: 98%