2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-001-0132-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the extended Techa river cohort: cancer risk estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other subgroup consists of ''late entrants'', that is people who first came to live in one of the riverside villages between January 1, 1953 and December 31,1960. As described elsewhere (3)(4)(5)7), these popu- a Distant migrants are treated as lost to follow-up from the date of migration from the extended catchment area, which means that the total lost to follow-up is 7,023 (4,182 distant migrants and 2,841 lost to follow-up among extended catchment area residents) as of December 31, 1999. b Last known to be alive prior to December 31, 1999 and treated as lost to follow-up from date of last known vital status. lations were identified from various official documents (including taxation, vital statistics, and medical records) between the late 1960s and the 1980s.…”
Section: Cohort Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other subgroup consists of ''late entrants'', that is people who first came to live in one of the riverside villages between January 1, 1953 and December 31,1960. As described elsewhere (3)(4)(5)7), these popu- a Distant migrants are treated as lost to follow-up from the date of migration from the extended catchment area, which means that the total lost to follow-up is 7,023 (4,182 distant migrants and 2,841 lost to follow-up among extended catchment area residents) as of December 31, 1999. b Last known to be alive prior to December 31, 1999 and treated as lost to follow-up from date of last known vital status. lations were identified from various official documents (including taxation, vital statistics, and medical records) between the late 1960s and the 1980s.…”
Section: Cohort Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about the Techa River cohort was published in the open literature in the early 1990s (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Over the last decade, major improvements in the follow-up of the study population (7) and dosimetry have been made (8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of particular interest are those exposed to fallout from the early weapons tests at Semipalatinsk in Kazakhstan (Grosche et al, 2002) and residents of communities neighbouring the Techa River (Kossenko et al, 2002). The Techa River received large quantities of highly radioactive effluent from the Mayak nuclear complex in the early years of weapons plutonium production, especially during 1950-1952, leading to heavy contamination of the river and its environs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination of the components of the Techa River system (water, bottom sediments, floodplain soils, and floodplain grasses) resulted in chronic external and internal exposure of about 30,000 residents of riverside communities. The 90 Sr-intake function is a fundamental component of the dose-reconstruction system used for assessment of radiogenic health effects in the Techa Riverside residents (Degteva et al 2000a(Degteva et al , 2006Kossenko et al 2002;Krestinina et al 2005Krestinina et al , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%