1961
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1961.tb11724.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Floral Histogenesis and Physiology of Perilla. Iii. Effects of Indoleacetic Acid on the Flowering of Apical Buds and Explants in Culture

Abstract: Raghavan, V. (Princeton U., Princeton, N. J.) Studies on the floral histogenesis and physiology of Perilla. III. Effects of indoleacetic acid on the flowering of apical buds and explants in culture. Amer. Jour. Bot. 48(10): 870–876. Illus. 1961.—The responses of apical buds and explants of a short‐day plant, Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt. var. 'Tall Late,' when grown in vitro in White's medium supplemented with indoleacetic acid (IAA) and subjected to short‐days (SD) or long‐days (LD), are described. Additions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This difference in response to LDs 16 h or longer explains adequately the differences previously reported from the culture in LD of shoot-tips of red Perilla (2) as contrasted to green Perilla (10,11). The relative ineffectiveness of LB, even of 2-h full lights, in substituting for LD in P.frutescens explains my recent preliminary results (unpublished) with cultures of shoot-tips in LB, as contrasted to our earlier LD data (1 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…3). This difference in response to LDs 16 h or longer explains adequately the differences previously reported from the culture in LD of shoot-tips of red Perilla (2) as contrasted to green Perilla (10,11). The relative ineffectiveness of LB, even of 2-h full lights, in substituting for LD in P.frutescens explains my recent preliminary results (unpublished) with cultures of shoot-tips in LB, as contrasted to our earlier LD data (1 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%