“…12 Our group has also carried out several studies on the preparation of highly conductive metal phosphates, such as (C 2 H 10 N 2 )[Mn 2 (HPO 4 ) 3 ](H 2 O) reached 1.64 × 10 −3 S cm −1 at 298 K and 99% RH, 13 However, owing to the required balance of positive and negative charges in open-framework metal phosphate, its structural framework is xed, which leads to its difficulty in increasing the proton conductivity by further modifying its structure using effective strategies, such as MOFs. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] For example (1) inclusion of functional guest molecules into the cavity of MOFs, such as acid molecules, imidazoles, and triazoles; [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] (2) use of organic linkers bearing hydrophilic groups (including -COOH, -OH, -SO 3 H, and -PO 3 H 2 ) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] as structural building units. Therefore, the most ways to improve the proton conductivity of open-framework metal phosphate are by optimizing the conductive environment at present, for example, increasing the temperature and relative humidity and changing the water to an ammonia environment.…”