1973
DOI: 10.2307/3573682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Inducible Inhibitor of Radiation-Induced DNA Degradation of Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would indicate either that the preinduced level of the protein is sufficient to control the exonuclease activity generated by a low UV dose or that the exonuclease only operates at higher UV doses. A similar enhancement of DNA degradation by chloramphenicol after UV irradiation is known in E. coli (18), and it has been suggested that normally the recA protein (24) or the ssb protein (12) 5. Appearance of label in medium containing chloramphenicol after irradiation of D. radiodurans strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This would indicate either that the preinduced level of the protein is sufficient to control the exonuclease activity generated by a low UV dose or that the exonuclease only operates at higher UV doses. A similar enhancement of DNA degradation by chloramphenicol after UV irradiation is known in E. coli (18), and it has been suggested that normally the recA protein (24) or the ssb protein (12) 5. Appearance of label in medium containing chloramphenicol after irradiation of D. radiodurans strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For cells undergoing inducing treatment, the required UV dose, varied to fit the strain, was given. Previous studies (Pollard and Randall, 1973) show that for UV induction of the induced inhibitor there is a maximum at about 15 J/m2 for wild-type strains and 1.5-2 J/m2 for uvr-strains. After the UV treatment, the cells were bubbled with air at 370C for 40 min to allow for synthesis of all induced proteins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The work of Grady and Pollard (1968) confirmed these findings and suggested that radiation acts to cause the initiation of DNA degradation and to induce a factor controlling the amount of degradation as well. Pollard and Randall (1973), using preliminary UV treatment, together with a subsequent prevention of transcription with rifampin, demonstrated the time-course of its induction and some of the strains in which it was found. Marsden et al (1974) showed that the induction of the inhibitor of degradation could not be found in cells that were recAor lex-, suggesting that these genes were involved with the inhibition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an attempt to explain this observation, we suggest that the recA product itself, which is known to be induced and accumulated in tifcells at 410C (12, 13) and to limit in vivo DNA breakdown (27), may contribute to the amount of extra repair observed. The same explanation can be applied to the fact that pre-irradiation with UV light causes a subsequent increase in survival after -y-ray irradiation (21); in this case, this "UV-stimulated" bacterial reactivation after yirradiation has been correlated (i) with an increased repair of single-strand breaks (29) and (ii) with a lower level of DNA degradation (22). This bacterial reactivation process has further been found (i) to be dependent upon de novo protein synthesis, (ii) not to be associated with mutagenesis, and (iii) to take place only in an excision-proficient uvrA' cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%