1978
DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(78)90037-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the mode of interaction of 4'-epi-adriamycin and 4-demethoxy-daunomycin with DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the molecular inhibition mechanism of idarubicin is not different from that of the other anthracyclines tested in this study (Plumbridge & Brown 1978), why is idarubicin the only compound displaying trypanocidal activity against T. rangeli? The answer to this question may lie in the structure of the molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Since the molecular inhibition mechanism of idarubicin is not different from that of the other anthracyclines tested in this study (Plumbridge & Brown 1978), why is idarubicin the only compound displaying trypanocidal activity against T. rangeli? The answer to this question may lie in the structure of the molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The fluorescence emission of drugs bound to DNA can be either enhanced, as observed for ethidium bromide, 24 or efficiently quenched, as found for certain aminoacridines and anthracyclines, including daunomycin 25 and adriamycin. 26 Triazolopyridopyrimidines 1a-1c are fluorescent compounds, so their DNA interaction was also studied by measuring the changes in their fluorescence emission in the presence of DNA.…”
Section: Luminescence Titrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idarubicin in induction therapy IDR, a lipophilic analogue of DNR, has been extensively tested as part of the 7 + 3 backbone in AML. It is structurally identical to DNR except for a change at position 4 of its chromophore ring conferring a higher lipophilic coefficient, induction of more DNA single-strand breaks in tumor cells, and an active metabolite with a longer halflife as compared with DNR in vitro [Zunino et al 1976;Supino et al 1977;Plumbridge et al 1978;Speth et al 1986]. After phase I testing revealed a myelosuppressive dose-limiting toxicity of 12 mg/ m 2 , phase II studies were performed in Italy, France, and the United States demonstrating that IDR as a single agent induced CR in 13-22% of adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML [Hayat et al 1984;Daghestani et al 1985;Gillies et al 1987].…”
Section: Other Anthracyclinesmentioning
confidence: 99%