In a previons work (1950) tbe present author attempted to clarify somewbat the essential metaholite relations of some Tricholoma species; at that time tbe effect of exogeneous additions of several amino acids having heen tested. The majority of S|)ecies gave a positive response to glutamie and to aspartic acids. Positive reactions to these acids have also heen ohtained for several other hymenomycetes, e.g. Boletus variegatus (Melin 1950), Polyporus ahietinus (Fries aud Aschan 1952). It was suggested, that the beneficial effect of these two dicarboxylic amino acids is bound up with their effect on the initial stages of growtb, at which stage ibey would he superior to every other amino acid, providing they have no toxic-effect on the organism and that there exists no complete helerolrophy which could prevent the synthesis of any particular amitio acid.However, since several organisms are ahle readily to form ghttamic acid hy reductive aniination of a-ketoglntaric acid, the stimulative effect of the dicarboxylic amino acids should not, perhaps, he ascribed to the amino acids as such hut to their carbon skeleton. As estahlished by Leonian and Lilly (1940), organic acids have a stimulative effect on fungal growth, and it seems not nnreasonahic l<( suppose that in the preseut case a-ketoglutaric, oxaloacetic, and probably other acids involved in the Krebs tricarhoxylic acid cycle could he effective as substittttes. Thus, the present study was undertaken in order to compare the growth effects of the two amino acids concerned, as well as of their corresponding keto-acids and fumaric acid.[584]