1989
DOI: 10.1016/0007-1935(89)90010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the prevalence and laboratory transmission of fascioliasis in animals in the Kashmir valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fascioliasis is more common in sheep and causes high economic loses to sheep rearing farmers. The incidence rate of fascioliasis in various climatic regions like tarai, hills and plains in northern region of India was recorded as 10.79% in cattle, 13.90% in buffaloes, 2.78% in sheep and 2.35% in goats (Sharma et al, 1989;Garg et al, 2009). One of the studies conducted in Gorakhpur district showed that about 94% of the buffaloes are infected with F. gigantica (Singh & Agarwal, 1981).…”
Section: Fascioliasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fascioliasis is more common in sheep and causes high economic loses to sheep rearing farmers. The incidence rate of fascioliasis in various climatic regions like tarai, hills and plains in northern region of India was recorded as 10.79% in cattle, 13.90% in buffaloes, 2.78% in sheep and 2.35% in goats (Sharma et al, 1989;Garg et al, 2009). One of the studies conducted in Gorakhpur district showed that about 94% of the buffaloes are infected with F. gigantica (Singh & Agarwal, 1981).…”
Section: Fascioliasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations on in vitro F. gigantica infection of L. auricularia revealed: (1) younger snails (1-4 weeks) were not suitable for in vitro infections and had higher mortality (Prasad 1989); (2) a higher intake of infection from the bubaline origin than caprine/ovine origin F. gigantica miracidia (Dhar and Sharma 1986); (3) optimum temperature for in situ development of miracidia and metacercarial production was 25°C ± 0.5°C (Dhar and Sharma 1986); (4) laboratory infected snails had a lower metacercarial production than those collected from water bodies in the nature (Sharma et al 1989); (5) positivity of snails was inversely proportional to availability of space for miracidial migration at the time of in vitro infection (Dhar and Sharma 1986); (6) cercarial production occurred in waves, with an in-between 1 and 12 days resting period(s) and floating cysts of F. gigantica were produced in the first few waves of cercarial production cycles (Dhar and Sharma 1986); (7) no development and emergence of F. gigantica cercariae from L. auricularia occurred below 12°C and above 33°C, however, a temperature of 20°C was optimum for the purpose (Sharma et al 1989); (8) an infected snail, in optimum environmental conditions during autumn months was capable of producing sufficient number of F. gigantica MC, causing acute, clinical and fatal disease in ten buffalo yearlings. On an average 204 F. gigantica MC are produced per day by an infected snail (Sharma et al 1989); (9) over 95% cercariae shedding by the infected snails were observed during night between 6 pm and 6 am next day (Gupta and Yadav 1994); (10) unlike F. hepatica, the escaping site of F. gigantica cercariae from developing rediae in L. auricularia was not confined to birth pore(s) in the rediae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On an average 204 F. gigantica MC are produced per day by an infected snail (Sharma et al 1989); (9) over 95% cercariae shedding by the infected snails were observed during night between 6 pm and 6 am next day (Gupta and Yadav 1994); (10) unlike F. hepatica, the escaping site of F. gigantica cercariae from developing rediae in L. auricularia was not confined to birth pore(s) in the rediae. The freely floating cercariae could emerge out from any site of the redial elastic, acellular but sticky tegument, leaving behind a self healing indentation (Yadav et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of statistically and epidemiologic data, evaluating liver fluke prevalence in livestock based on liver condemnation statistics might be useful. Information about infections of cattle, sheep and goats with liver fluke in south-western Asia were reported from some countries such as Iraq (Al-Khafaji et al 2003), Pakistan (Sharma and Raina 1989), Saudi Arabia (Over et al 1992) and Turkey (Gül and Aydin 2008). An old report has only been published on prevalence of Liver fasciolosis in sheep, cattle, goats and buffaloes from Ahwaz, Iran (Ahmadi and Meshkehkar 2010), although several reports exist on those in other regions of Iran (Daryani et al 2006;Moghaddam et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%