1968
DOI: 10.1071/bi9680721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on The Scutellar Bristles of Drosophila Melanogaster I. Basic Variability, Some Temperature and Culture Effects, and Responses to Short-Term Selection in the Oregon-Rc Strain

Abstract: SummaryThe results of short runs of disruptive and high selection for scutellar bristles in wild-type Drosophila are explained in terms of the hypothesis that canalization at four bristles is due to regulation of the major gene in the developmental system (Rendel, Sheldon, and Finlay 1965). Selection response has probably been due to selection for modifier (minor) genes rather than for isoalleles of the major gene or weak regulator alleles. Some environmental effects on the character, short runs of selection f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of large base population scores for Oregon-RC in which bristle position was scored (Sheldon 1968), confirms that posterior scutellars are to some extent more strongly canalized than anterior scutellars. The relevant results are as follows:…”
Section: Correlated Responses and Changes In Dominancementioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of large base population scores for Oregon-RC in which bristle position was scored (Sheldon 1968), confirms that posterior scutellars are to some extent more strongly canalized than anterior scutellars. The relevant results are as follows:…”
Section: Correlated Responses and Changes In Dominancementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The existence of an anterior-posterior gradient of some kind cannot be denied, but it seems doubtful that changes in bristle number and in degree of canalization around 4 scutellar bristles are simply a composite function of essentially independent anterior and posterior components, as concluded by Scowcroft (1973). Extra bristles in the interstitial position are inexplicable even in the unselected base population in Oregon-RC, where they are nearly half as frequent as extra anteriors in females and almost as frequent as extra anteriors in males (Sheldon 1968). Latt~r and Scowcroft (1970) did not report any appreciable incidence of interstitial bristles in un selected Canberra populations or in two generation selection lines for high anteriors taken from the Canberra population.…”
Section: Correlated Responses and Changes In Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sheldon (1968) following Rendel et al (1965) and Rendel (1967Rendel ( , 1968Rendel ( , 1969 had held the hypothesis that canalization at four bristles in wild type is accomplished by genetic regulation of the scute locus and that selection for high bristle number merely changed the minor gene background without affecting the canalization genotype. In contrast to this, Sheldon and Milton (1972) interpreted * Part II, Genetics, 1972, 71, 567-95. t Formerly Milton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%