“…Therefore reference values from dry bone studies should not be applied to assessments based on radiographs. Radiological methods to examine the medial clavicular epiphysis in living individuals are conventional radiography (CR) (Flecker, 1933;Galstaun, 1937;Jit & Kullkarni, 1976;, computed tomography (CT) (Kreitner et al, 1997(Kreitner et al, , 1998Schulz et al, 2005;Schulze et al, 2006;Bassed et al, 2010;Kellinghaus et al, 2010a, b), as well as new approaches using magnet resonance imaging (Schmidt et al, 2007;Hillewig et al, 2011) and ultrasoundsonography (Schulz et al, 2008b;Quirmbach et al, 2009;Schulz et al, 2010). While traditional classification systems differentiate between four stages of clavicle ossification (stage 1: ossification centre not ossified; stage 2: ossification centre ossified, epiphyseal plate not ossified; stage 3: epiphyseal plate partly ossified; stage 4: epiphyseal plate fully ossified), Schmeling et al divided the stage of total epiphyseal fusion into two additional stages (stage 4: epiphyseal plate fully ossified, epiphyseal scar visible; stage 5: epiphyseal plate fully ossified, epiphyseal scar no longer visible).…”