2016
DOI: 10.5958/2230-732x.2016.00139.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Variability, Heritability, Genetic advance and Correlation in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the presence of variability in present investigation indicated the ample scope of selection for these traits. Similar trends of high significant difference among the different genotypes were observed by Parimala et al, 2011, Pinnisch et al, 2012and Patil et al, 2016in maize and Jakhar et al, 2016 in chickpea in previous studies.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the presence of variability in present investigation indicated the ample scope of selection for these traits. Similar trends of high significant difference among the different genotypes were observed by Parimala et al, 2011, Pinnisch et al, 2012and Patil et al, 2016in maize and Jakhar et al, 2016 in chickpea in previous studies.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Ear diameter, TSW, ABM, EL, NKPR, HI, SCH and RBM had strong indirect effect on the grain yield by ear biomass at Assosa site (Table7), and plant height exhibited strong positive indirect effect on the grain yield by ABM, EBM, TSW, NKPR, NEHPP, and EL (Table 8) which indicates the correlation coefficient with grain yield is due to the exertion of these traits. The negative direct effect of plant height on the grain yield of this finding at Bambasi is similar with the pervious finding Sreckov et al (2011) while partially contradicted with the finding of Kumar et al (2006) and Patil et al (2016) who reported that plant height and EBM showed positive direct effect on the grain yield. The positive direct effect of root biomass on the grain yield agreed with the findings of Mhoswa et al (2016) and Silva et al (2016) who reported that root dry matter and root fresh weight had positive direct effect on grain yield which directly related with the nitrogen absorption capacity of the crop that helps to afford the nutrient demand of the crop and increasing the yield.…”
Section: Genotypic Path Coefficient Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Days to maturity showed significant positive genotypic and phenotypic correlation with days to anthesis, days to silking, plant height and ear height. Similarly, significant positive correlation were reported for fresh ear weight and yield, days to anthesis with days to silking and days to maturity, ear height with plant height and days to silking (Patil et al, 2016;Reddy et al, 2012;Sadaiah et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%