2023
DOI: 10.3390/app13021113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study and Design of Distributed Badminton Agility Training and Test System

Abstract: In order to improve the agility of college students, this paper designs a distributed agility training system. The system includes an upper computer and nine lower computers, in which the lower computer realizes the functions of data acquisition and communication with the upper computer and calculates the reaction time. The Android-based system software was installed in the upper computer to complete the functions of network connection, setting training times and showing the exercise time. In order to test the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the differences between the control and experimental groups after training, a sample t-test was used to compare and analyze the data on the various abilities of the experimental subjects, and the results are shown in Table 6. (26) The experimental group was trained using the agility training equipment, and the control group was trained using conventional training methods. After 9 weeks, the p-values for the 5 m three-way fold run and 20 s straddle jump were less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant difference between the effectiveness of the training of the experimental group and the control group.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the differences between the control and experimental groups after training, a sample t-test was used to compare and analyze the data on the various abilities of the experimental subjects, and the results are shown in Table 6. (26) The experimental group was trained using the agility training equipment, and the control group was trained using conventional training methods. After 9 weeks, the p-values for the 5 m three-way fold run and 20 s straddle jump were less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant difference between the effectiveness of the training of the experimental group and the control group.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of previous studies related to badminton that analysed agility variables showed that innovation from various types of agility tests that have specificity is needed (Wira Yudha Kusuma, 2015); (De França Bahia Loureiro & De Freitas, 2016); (De França Bahia Loureiro et al, 2017); (Yıldız & Fidan, 2018); (Jansen et al, 2021); (Rojas et al, 2022); (Tan et al, 2023). In fact, in the field, badminton agility tests still use general tests such as shuttle runs, T tests, or zigzag runs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology is to measure the time needed to perform agility movements, the data shows the maximum time taken to complete the test is 25 seconds while the minimum time is only 15 seconds (Marrylin Yalin et al, 2022). The results of other studies explain that the use of artificial technology for agility tests can also be used for agility exercises for eight weeks in the preparation, improvement and special stages (Tan et al, 2023). However, the badminton agility test in previous studies is still based on agility tests in general, so it is not in accordance with the conditions in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional group training is divided into three stages: before, during and after the stage, and the specific training arrangement of each stage training is shown in Table 4 ( Pan, 2018 ; Zhang and Dai, 2022 ; Tan, 2023 ).…”
Section: Research Objects and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%