2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2009.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study and performance of a group-based Content Delivery Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grouping nodes also diminishes the average network delay while allows to scale the network considerably. We have applied group-based networks to several research areas with success [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In this paper, each group could be an enterprise, a university or a research center or institute (from now we are going to call them research entities).…”
Section: Architecture Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grouping nodes also diminishes the average network delay while allows to scale the network considerably. We have applied group-based networks to several research areas with success [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In this paper, each group could be an enterprise, a university or a research center or institute (from now we are going to call them research entities).…”
Section: Architecture Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the footsteps of the CDI initiative, several research efforts explore the benefits of internetworking/peering of CDN providers, content providers, Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks, and overlays with main focus on offering increased capacity, intelligent server selection, reduced cost, and improved fault tolerance. Examples include CDI protocol architecture (Turrini, 2004;Turrini & Panzieri, 2002), multiprovider peering (Amini, et al, 2004), Synergy overlay internetworking (Kwon & Fahmy, 2005), peer-assisted content delivery (Tran & Tavanapong, 2005), group-based content delivery (Lloret, et al, 2009), provisioning content delivery over shared infrastructure (Nguyen, et al, 2003), use of emerging technologies for the development of enhanced content delivery service (Fortino & Russo, 2008), resource management in a Gridbased CDN (Di Stefano & Santoro, 2008), capacity provisioning networks (Geng, et al, 2003), open CDN implementation (Molina, et al, 2006), and CDN peering (Pathan & Buyya, 2009a, 2009b.…”
Section: Metacdn and Related Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the content traffic increases, one of the major roles of today's Internet is to provide content distribution, which includes distributing multimedia content and sharing usergenerated data, e.g., YouTube and Hulu. To meet network traffic growing demands, content distribution technologies emerged, e.g., Data Center Networks (DCNs), Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) (Akamai and Limelight) (Pallis and Vakali, 2006;Lloret et al, 2009), and P2P networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%