Study Noise Pollution Tyumen Using Gis

Dobryakova, Valentina; Kolesov, A. A.

doi:10.24057/2414-9179-2016-2-22-268-273

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Geographers have since then seldom produced studies on noise, usually traffic-related (e.g. Kariel 1990;Tadeu et al 1995;Bennett 1997;Muscar Benasayag 2000;Lam et al 2010;Szeremeta & Zannin 2015;Dobryakova & Kolesov 2016). Once again, a possible explanation for this is the significant development of quantitative approaches to sound and noise in other scientific disciplines, in this case engineering (Ingerslev 1952(Ingerslev , 1972Schultz 1978), architecture (Maekawa & Lord 1993), and psychology (Kryter 1970).…”

Section: Geography Starts To Listenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissonance: scientific paradigms underpinning the study of sound in geography

Paiva

2018

Fennia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this article is to approach the different conceptions of sound -and its relations to the underlying scientific paradigms -that emerged throughout the history of geography. There has been a growing interest among geographers in understanding the spatialities of sound, and geographies of sound have become an emerging subfield of the discipline. For this reason, it is the right time to address how the discipline has approached sound throughout its history. Several theoretical perspectives influenced geography in the twentieth century, changing its methodologies and how its subjects were conceived. Sound, like other subjects, has been conceived very differently by geographers of competing paradigms. Concepts such as noise, soundscape, or sound as affect, among others, have dominated geographies of sound at specific periods. Due to the marginality of the subject in the discipline, assessments of these conceptual shifts are rare. I tackle this issue in this article as I provide a first attempt of writing a history of sound in geography. The article reviews debates regarding the name of the subfield, and the conceptions of sound in the successive and competing scientific paradigms in geography.

show abstract