8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-4763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of a global design space exploration method for aerospace vehicles

Abstract: In the early stages of the design process of aerospace vehicles, the search for optimal configurations encompasses a broad range of possibilities, and the use of local optimization tools may risk missing the best designs. Therefore, global optimization methods are attractive for the early design stage. Unfortunately, global design optimization usually requires the evaluation of a very large number of designs, a formidable computational challenge. The present work uses a highly effective Lipschitzian global opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors adopted a straightforward approach to parallel function evaluations for expensive objective functions in the original DIRECT. In contrast, other practical applications employed enhanced DIRECT algorithms, which proved to be more computationally demanding (Baker et al, 2001;Dapšys et al, 2023;He et al, 2004). Two studies (Baker et al, 2001;Dapšys et al, 2023) utilized the "Aggressive" version of the DIRECT algorithm, relaxing the selection of POH criteria and subdividing hyperrectangles in each iteration of every diameter, leading to improved parallel efficiency.…”
Section: Implementation Details Programming Language and Source Code ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors adopted a straightforward approach to parallel function evaluations for expensive objective functions in the original DIRECT. In contrast, other practical applications employed enhanced DIRECT algorithms, which proved to be more computationally demanding (Baker et al, 2001;Dapšys et al, 2023;He et al, 2004). Two studies (Baker et al, 2001;Dapšys et al, 2023) utilized the "Aggressive" version of the DIRECT algorithm, relaxing the selection of POH criteria and subdividing hyperrectangles in each iteration of every diameter, leading to improved parallel efficiency.…”
Section: Implementation Details Programming Language and Source Code ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other practical applications employed enhanced DIRECT algorithms, which proved to be more computationally demanding (Baker et al, 2001;Dapšys et al, 2023;He et al, 2004). Two studies (Baker et al, 2001;Dapšys et al, 2023) utilized the "Aggressive" version of the DIRECT algorithm, relaxing the selection of POH criteria and subdividing hyperrectangles in each iteration of every diameter, leading to improved parallel efficiency. Furthermore, He et al (2004) proposed a hierarchical parallel scheme for DIRECT, where the initial domain was decomposed into smaller parts and each sub-domain was optimized independently using a master-slave scheme.…”
Section: Implementation Details Programming Language and Source Code ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33], the authors introduced the aggressive selection of POH. This strategy selects at least one hyper-rectangle from each group of different measures (δ i k ) with the lowest function value.…”
Section: Limiting the Measure Of Hyper-rectanglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary experience of applying DI-RECT to the route-finding problem in [14] shows that it minimizes (2.2) more efficiently than than the methods in [1] and [5] which employ random searching. The use of DIRECT in aerospace design problems (with quite large numbers of variables) is reported in [2], [3], [4], [6], [7], [12] and [13]. In [7], in particular, it is noted that it does better than a trajectory-following approach on functions with deep and widely spaced minima.…”
Section: An Outline Of Directmentioning
confidence: 99%