2016
DOI: 10.12775/tmna.2016.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of a logistic equation with local and non-local reaction terms

Abstract: Abstract. In this work we examine a logistic equation with local and nonlocal reaction terms both for time dependent and steady-state problems. Mainly, we use bifurcation and monotonicity methods to prove the existence of positive solutions for the steady-state equation and sub-supersolution method for the long time behavior for the time dependent problem. The results depend strongly on the size and sign of the parameters on the local and non-local terms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more works on (5) with b(x, t) ≡ 0, the reader is referred to [1,25,26], and for more works on nonlocal reaction-diffusion model on the whole space, the reader is referred to [3,4,10,17,18]. For the study of ( 6)-( 7) in time independence case, we refer the reader to [9,13,16,47], in which the authors applied the bifurcation theory and monotonicity methods to study the existence and stability of steady states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more works on (5) with b(x, t) ≡ 0, the reader is referred to [1,25,26], and for more works on nonlocal reaction-diffusion model on the whole space, the reader is referred to [3,4,10,17,18]. For the study of ( 6)-( 7) in time independence case, we refer the reader to [9,13,16,47], in which the authors applied the bifurcation theory and monotonicity methods to study the existence and stability of steady states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 2.1 From Lemmas 2.4 and 2.5 and bifurcation theorem (see [18]), the same proof as that of Theorem 2.2 in [8] guarantees the existence of an unbounded continuum C 0 of positive solutions of (1.1). Moreover, conclusion (i) is true.…”
Section: Lemma 24 Ifmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The proof is complete. Conclusion (i) is Proposition 3.1 in [8] and the proof of (ii) is similar to that in Theorem 3.1, and we omit it.…”
Section: From (35) Andmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations