2010
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/035002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of albumin and fibrinogen membranes formed by interfacial crosslinking using microfluidic flow

Abstract: Microfluidics enables scale reduction in sample volume with obvious benefits for reagent conservation. In contrast to conventional macro-scale flow, microfluidics also offers unprecedented control over flow dynamics. In particular, laminar flow is readily achieved, allowing for new analytical and synthetic strategies. Here, two parallel flows of buffer and xylene were used to create a stable liquid-liquid interface within linear micro-channels. These, respectively, carried protein (albumin or fibrinogen) and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A magnified image taken from the boxed region (Figure C) demonstrates that the more or less spherical pores in the interior were approximately 3 μm in diameter and a dense layer was formed at the surface due to the cross‐linking reaction. The thickness of the cross‐linked layer was approximately 3.5 μm, which is one order of magnitude smaller than the values reported in other studies . This difference can be attributed to a high cross‐linking density in our system, which was caused by a high concentration of TCL (saturated in toluene).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A magnified image taken from the boxed region (Figure C) demonstrates that the more or less spherical pores in the interior were approximately 3 μm in diameter and a dense layer was formed at the surface due to the cross‐linking reaction. The thickness of the cross‐linked layer was approximately 3.5 μm, which is one order of magnitude smaller than the values reported in other studies . This difference can be attributed to a high cross‐linking density in our system, which was caused by a high concentration of TCL (saturated in toluene).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The thickness of the cross-linked layer was approximately 3.5 μm, which is one order of magnitude smaller than the values reported in other studies. [ 35,36 ] This difference can be attributed to a high cross-linking density in our system, which was caused by a high concentration of TCL (saturated in toluene). Once the surface layer was crosslinked, it would serve as a diffusion barrier, retarding the diffusion of TCL towards the interior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, these phenomena include, but are not limited to: (i) Laminar flow, where movement of fluids transmits dissipative forces proportional to the flow rate [29][30][31][32] (ii) Interfacial forces, were the attractive forces between molecules at the interface of two or more fluids are equal to zero [33][34][35] (iii) Capillary action, which enables fluids to flow within narrow spaces of porous materials without the assistance of external forces [27,[36][37][38] and (iv) Electrokinesis, where an imposed electric field induces fluidic transport [39,40]. In addition, devices fabricated at the microscale provide the remarkable advantage of precise experimental validation against analytical models of molecular and convective transport [41,42], viscoelasticity [43][44][45], electrochemical dynamics [46,47] and many others [48][49][50][51][52]. These advantages have pioneered the development of single and multiplexed microfluidic channels [53][54][55], micropatterned substrate surfaces [56][57][58][59], and three-dimensional (3D) microfabricated structures [60,61] to examine localized cell behavior.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 However, a vast amount of literature generated in recent years on the topic of protein adhesion to materials has yield a "striking" lack of consensus so extreme that no general conclusions can be extracted on the subject of material design parameters that favors protein adhesion. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Only a general rule that a low crystal size/low particle size favor bone regenation while a high crystallinity favors bone resorption 19 and a common agreement on the importance of roughness 20 are generally acknowledged. However, the design of materials for bone regeneration requires a better understanding of the adsorption of serum proteins to those materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%