Flavouring Group Evaluation 87, Revision 1 EFSA Journal 2012;10(2):2564 2 through a stepwise approach that integrates information on structure-activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern, and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel agrees with the application of the Procedure as performed by the JECFA for all 17 substances considered in this FGE and agrees with the JECFA conclusion, "No safety concern at estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances" based on the MSDI approach. Besides the safety assessment of these flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered for the substances evaluated through the Procedure and for two substances, [FL-no: This consideration deals with 17 bicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters, which are in the Register and which were evaluated by the JECFA at its 63 rd meeting.The revision is made due to consideration of two additional substances [FL-no: 02.100 and 02.101] compared to the previous version. These two substances are alpha,beta-unsaturated substances which have been considered with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.211 and FGE.212Rev1, and the Panel concluded that the data available ruled out the concern for genotoxicity and thus concluded that the two substances can be evaluated through the Procedure in this FGE.87Rev1. EU production volume on two substances [FL-no: 09.153 and 09.319] and new information on stereoisomerism for 13 substances 02.038, 02.059, 07.159, 09.017, 09.082, 09.131, 09.153, 09.176, 09.218, 09.319, 09.456 and 09.457] are also included.The Panel concluded that all 17 substances are structurally related to the group of four bicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones and related evaluated by EFSA in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 47 (FGE.47).The Panel agrees with the application of the Procedure as performed by the JECFA for the 17 bicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters. It was concluded at step A3 of the Procedure that the 17 substances do not pose a safety concern when used as flavouring substances at estimated levels of intake, based on the MSDI approach.For all 17 substances evaluated through the Procedure use levels are needed to calculate the mTAMDIs in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessments and to finalise the evaluation.In order to determine whether the conclusion for the JECFA-evaluated substances can be applied to the materials of commerce, it is necessary to consider the available specifications. Specifications are available for all the materials of commerce. For two of the candidate substances [FL-no: 02.100 and 02.101] the stereoisomeric composition has not been specified. Thus, for these two JECFA-evaluated substances [FL-no: 02.100 and 02.101] the Panel has reservations (information on the stereoisomeric composition is lacking).For the remaining 15 JECFA-evaluated substances