16th Joint Propulsion Conference 1980
DOI: 10.2514/6.1980-1242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of cooling air inlet and exit geometries for horizontally opposed piston aircraft engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Ref. 5 show that this particular side exit configuration increased flow separation over the rear part of the nacelle and thereby increased the drag. In the presence of the propeller slipstream, however, the drag is not only lower (generally), but also continues to decrease with flow rate; this is in contrast with the propeller-off configuration, for which the drag slightly increased with flow rates.…”
Section: Side Exitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of Ref. 5 show that this particular side exit configuration increased flow separation over the rear part of the nacelle and thereby increased the drag. In the presence of the propeller slipstream, however, the drag is not only lower (generally), but also continues to decrease with flow rate; this is in contrast with the propeller-off configuration, for which the drag slightly increased with flow rates.…”
Section: Side Exitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5. The upper plenum pressure recovery C p as a function of inlet area ratio A ^ IA f , where A " is the incoming flow cross-section area ahead of the model (Fig.…”
Section: Variation Of Inlet Areamentioning
confidence: 99%