2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of dynamic behaviors for nano Fe-doped MgB2 superconductor via ac-susceptibility measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These materials comprise dopants and additives, such as carbon, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] silver, etc. [6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Dopants interact with lattice, whereas additives form secondary phases, both acting then as pinning centers. These substituents were added to the solid mixture of Mg and B powders, rigorously mixed before sintering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials comprise dopants and additives, such as carbon, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] silver, etc. [6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Dopants interact with lattice, whereas additives form secondary phases, both acting then as pinning centers. These substituents were added to the solid mixture of Mg and B powders, rigorously mixed before sintering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were secondary phases at 2θ of 32.54°, 37.7°, and 45.08° which were assigned to the FeB phase. It is remarkable to mention that the impurity peak at 45.08° (labeled by •) can also be related to Fe 2 B, especially at high concentration doping of Fe (x = 0.1) 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that nano Fe-and Co-doped samples contain tiny grains and imperfect crystallinity. The Scherrer's equation is applied to calculate the average particle size (D) of the nanoparticles for each sample (peak 101) where k = 0.94 is the shape factor of a particle, presuming shape of the nanoparticles as sphere, λ = 1.5406 Å the wavelength of Cu Kα radiation, β is the FWHM of the XRD (101) peak, and θ is the diffraction angle of the peak 43 . A glance at the table points out that the average grain size of the parent MgB 2 is about 29 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were secondary phases at 2θ of 32.54°, 37.7°, and 45.08° which were assigned to the FeB phase. It is remarkable to mention that the impurity peak at 45.08° (labeled by ) can also be related to Fe2B, especially at high concentration doping of Fe (x = 0.1) 43 . The minor amount of impurities with infinitesimal peaks indicated that the substitution of Co and Fe for Mg has significantly suppressed the amount of Mg and MgO formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that nano Fe-and Co-doped samples contain tiny grains and imperfect crystallinity. The Scherrer's equation is applied to calculate the average particle size (D) of the nanoparticles for each sample (peak 101) D = ( λ) ⁄ ( ) where k = 0.94 is the shape factor of a particle, presuming shape of the nanoparticles as sphere,  = 1.5406 Å the wavelength of Cu K radiation,  is the FWHM of the XRD (101) peak, and  is the diffraction angle of the peak 43 . A glance at the table points out that the average grain size of the parent MgB2 is about 29 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%