2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01394-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of flow profile distortions and efficiency in counter pressure moderated partial filling micellar electrokinetic chromatography in relation to the relative buffer zone lengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The leading edge of the flow profile is less disturbed by the introduction of the hydrodynamic flow than either the center of gravity or trailing edge. This observation agrees well with the observations in the literature [10,13]. As expected, when siphoning takes place in the same direction as EOF, the net flow is faster while the flow is slower when the siphoning opposes the EOF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leading edge of the flow profile is less disturbed by the introduction of the hydrodynamic flow than either the center of gravity or trailing edge. This observation agrees well with the observations in the literature [10,13]. As expected, when siphoning takes place in the same direction as EOF, the net flow is faster while the flow is slower when the siphoning opposes the EOF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…By suppressing flow in discrete regions of the capillary surface of a single capillary, researchers found that the plug flow was perturbed and, in fact, the flow profiles had complimentary shapes in areas with suppressed flow relative to unsuppressed regions of the capillary [9]. This finding is confirmed for partial filling MEKC [10] and explained by theory [11,12]. Tallarek et al [13] studied both EOF and pressure-driven flow in both open and packed CE capillaries and verified that purely electrokinetic driven separations were superior to those that employed pressurized flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the case of differences in the electroosmotic velocity in different segments of the capillary (e.g. partial filling technique) band broadening can result from intersegmental pressure [67]. A further source of band broadening can be analyte adsorption at the inner capillary wall, which should be suppressed by a suitable composition of the separation electrolyte or dynamic or static coating of the inner capillary wall.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the pf‐ACE over the ms‐ACE lies in the fact that the ligand does not reach a detector. This can be prerequisite for coupling the separation with a mass spectrometric detection or it significantly contributes to reducing a noise, especially when the ligand is UV‐absorbing [i]. Low consumption of a (possibly expensive, rare) ligand is another big advantage of the pf‐ACE .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%