2006
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of free‐surface seepage problems using hypersingular equations

Abstract: SUMMARYFree-surface boundary is not only unknown in a priori but also the boundary conditions are overspecified. In this paper, the Laplace problem with overspecified boundary conditions on the free surface is solved by using the hypersingular equation instead of singular equation used conventionally in boundary element method. The free surface can be determined using an iterative procedure starting from an initial guess. By introducing the hypersingular equation, the convergence rate of free surface can be ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Eqs. (11) and (12), the original Signorini problem (1)-(5) is reduced to the following linear problem:…”
Section: The Mfs For Signorini Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Eqs. (11) and (12), the original Signorini problem (1)-(5) is reduced to the following linear problem:…”
Section: The Mfs For Signorini Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some applications of the BEM for Signorini problems can be found in Refs. [2,3,9,11,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are 132 iterations to reach the stopping criterion using the Picard scheme. The numerical solutions of free surface were then compared with those obtained from Aitchison et al [32,33]. The separation point is the intersection of the free surface and the seepage face.…”
Section: Modeling Of Subsurface Flow With Freementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the converged configuration of the free surface from the present method. Also, the results from the BEM (Chen et al, 2007) and the MFS (Chaiyo et al, 2011) are provided in Figure 8 for comparison. We can see that there is no significant difference on the computation results between the present method and other methods.…”
Section: Double-variable Hybrid Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%