1964
DOI: 10.1063/1.1718829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of High Speed Photomultiplier Systems

Abstract: Section I describes steps taken to optimize the pulse shape and dynamic range from a 56 AVP photomultiplier. Section II discusses a model for the response of a photomultiplier. The parameters used in this model are obtained from direct measurements on a 56 AVP photomultiplier. Monte Carlo methods, as well as analytic techniques, are used to predict quantities such as distribution of triggering times, pulse shapes, etc. It is found, for example, that in the resolution of small time differences the predictions u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrating Equation 2 over time from zero to infinity to get the total light output L, we see that L=normalI0τ  or  normalI0=L/τ. Finally, we note that when the initial intensity is relatively high, the theoretical timing resolution of a scintillator scales inversely with the square root of the initial photoelectron rate [27, 28], which is equal to the initial intensity I 0 multiplied by two constants (the photon collection efficiency and the PMT quantum efficiency), that is: Timing Resolution1/sqrt(ε·QE·normalI0), where ε is the collection efficiency and QE is the quantum efficiency.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating Equation 2 over time from zero to infinity to get the total light output L, we see that L=normalI0τ  or  normalI0=L/τ. Finally, we note that when the initial intensity is relatively high, the theoretical timing resolution of a scintillator scales inversely with the square root of the initial photoelectron rate [27, 28], which is equal to the initial intensity I 0 multiplied by two constants (the photon collection efficiency and the PMT quantum efficiency), that is: Timing Resolution1/sqrt(ε·QE·normalI0), where ε is the collection efficiency and QE is the quantum efficiency.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that with a small array (∼ 54 kg) of such detectors it is possible to yield in only one year of measurement a competitive physics result in the search for the neutrinoless double beta decay of 100 Mo using natural CaMoO 4 scintillating crystals (i.e. without enriching in 100 Mo or depleting in 48 Ca isotopes). This result would pave the way to a new class of ton scale experiments to search not only for neutrinoless double beta decay with potentially zero background, but also for dark matter and neutrino charged current reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be demonstrated [28][29][30] that if the individual photoelectrons in the leading edge of the signal are resolved in time, the First Signal algorithm should have the best performance. However, the photoelectron rate from 511 keV interactions in LSO is high enough that individual photoelectrons are not resolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%