2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11126-022-09983-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Impact of Telehealth Use on Clinic “No Show” Rates at an Academic Practice

Abstract: Objective To examine the clinic no-show rate across different modalities of care delivery (Face to Face, Telephone visits and Audio–Video visits). Methods Clinic no show data for adult patients was extracted from the electronic health records used by the psychiatry clinic for 10 months before pandemic and 10 months during pandemic. No show rate was analyzed by visits type (new vs return) and across different modalities (face-to-face vs Telephone vs Audio–Video) before a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One study saw a significant decrease in no-show rates when comparing operations data pre-and post-pandemic [33] . Other studies have also seen similar trends of clinic no-show rates decreasing from pre-pandemic to when telehealth became the primary patient care modality during the pandemic [10] . Telehealth decreases the number of cancellations and no-show rates; this ultimately provides a positive impact on clinic workflows, patient outcomes, and quality of care [32] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study saw a significant decrease in no-show rates when comparing operations data pre-and post-pandemic [33] . Other studies have also seen similar trends of clinic no-show rates decreasing from pre-pandemic to when telehealth became the primary patient care modality during the pandemic [10] . Telehealth decreases the number of cancellations and no-show rates; this ultimately provides a positive impact on clinic workflows, patient outcomes, and quality of care [32] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The perspectives from both healthcare providers and patients about the use of telehealth care modality is overall positive. After the initial adjustment period, the majority of healthcare providers reported being comfortable using telehealth for patient care [9] , [10] . Studies have shown that physicians felt they were able to diagnose acute conditions and provide efficient educational sessions during clinical consultations using telehealth [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study in the USA found that the no-show rates for phone consultations in psychiatry were significantly lower than face-to-face mode for both new visits ( p = 0.021) and return visits ( p < 0.001). 31 However, for new appointments for televisits, no-show rates did not significantly differ from face-to-face mode ( p = 0.681) or return ( p = 0.186). 31 Interestingly, a study on dermatology clinics found that televisits had significantly lower no-show rates compared with clinic visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“… 31 However, for new appointments for televisits, no-show rates did not significantly differ from face-to-face mode ( p = 0.681) or return ( p = 0.186). 31 Interestingly, a study on dermatology clinics found that televisits had significantly lower no-show rates compared with clinic visits. 32 This suggests that different types of health disciplines may require different strategies to tackle no-show rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Telehealth has generally been considered effective and is widely implemented to treat behavioral health conditions. Although knowledge about no-shows is critical to inform health care institutions for effective management of resources and better health outcomes, 1 a limited body of literature has compared no-shows between telehealth and in-person care in behavioral health clinics in rural settings that cater to patients with relatively low income.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%