2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of magnetohydrodynamic driven flow through LTCC channel with self-contained electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we present the results of our numerical computations and compare them with the experimental data obtained by Aguilar et al 25 Figure 2 depicts the steady-state current transmitted through the electrolyte solution as a function of the externally applied potential difference ⌬V across the electrodes in the absence ͑B =0͒ and presence ͑B = 0.44 T͒ of a magnetic field when the inlet bulk concentrations of K 4 ͓͑Fe͑CN͒ 6 ͔ and K 3 ͓͑Fe͑CN͒ 6 ͔ are C 0 = 0.25 M. In other words, the effects of the magnetic field on the resulting current are studied for two different magnetic flux densities, one at B = 0 and the other at B = 0.44 T under different potential differences. The circles ͑b͒ and triangles ͑᭡͒ represent, respectively, the experimental data obtained from Aguilar et al 25 for B = 0 and B = 0.44 T. The dash-dotted and solid lines in Fig. 2 represent, respectively, the currents obtained from the 3D model at B = 0 and B = 0.44 T. The dashed and dotted lines represent, respectively, the predicted currents from the 2D model at B = 0 and B = 0.44 T with the assumption of H ӷ W. The current nonlinearly increases with the applied potential difference, and the theoretical predictions of the 3D model qualitatively agree with the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we present the results of our numerical computations and compare them with the experimental data obtained by Aguilar et al 25 Figure 2 depicts the steady-state current transmitted through the electrolyte solution as a function of the externally applied potential difference ⌬V across the electrodes in the absence ͑B =0͒ and presence ͑B = 0.44 T͒ of a magnetic field when the inlet bulk concentrations of K 4 ͓͑Fe͑CN͒ 6 ͔ and K 3 ͓͑Fe͑CN͒ 6 ͔ are C 0 = 0.25 M. In other words, the effects of the magnetic field on the resulting current are studied for two different magnetic flux densities, one at B = 0 and the other at B = 0.44 T under different potential differences. The circles ͑b͒ and triangles ͑᭡͒ represent, respectively, the experimental data obtained from Aguilar et al 25 for B = 0 and B = 0.44 T. The dash-dotted and solid lines in Fig. 2 represent, respectively, the currents obtained from the 3D model at B = 0 and B = 0.44 T. The dashed and dotted lines represent, respectively, the predicted currents from the 2D model at B = 0 and B = 0.44 T with the assumption of H ӷ W. The current nonlinearly increases with the applied potential difference, and the theoretical predictions of the 3D model qualitatively agree with the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The electrodes cover the entire side walls of the microchannel ͑i.e., L 1 = 0, and L E = L. The RedOx electrolyte solution is a mixture of K 4 ͓Fe͑CN͒ 6 ͔ and K 3 ͓Fe͑CN͒ 6 ͔ in the absence of a supporting electrolyte. The simulation conditions are the same as those used in the experiments conducted by Aguilar et al 25 The electrolyte solution contains three ionic species K + , Fe͑CN͒ 6 3− , and Fe͑CN͒ 6 4− with charges z 1 =1, z 2 = −3, and z 3 = −4, respectively. The diffusion coefficients at room temperature of the species K + , Fe͑CN͒ 6 3− , and Fe͑CN͒ 6 4− are, respectively, 1.957ϫ 10 −9 m 2 / s, 0.896ϫ 10 −9 m 2 / s, and 0.735 ϫ 10 −9 m 2 /s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the device is subjected to an external magnetic field provided by either permanent magnets or electromagnets, the electric current interacts with the magnetic field to produce Lorentz body forces, which, in turn, drive fluid motion. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as magneto-hydrodynamics and has been utilized, among other things, to pump fluids in microfluidic conduits (Qian and Bau 2005; Jang and Lee 2000; Lemoff and Lee 2000; Leventis and Gao 2001;West et al 2002 and2003;Zhong et al 2002;Eijkel et al 2003;Harrison 2003a and2003b;Arumugam et al 2005 and2006;Aguilar et al 2006;Nguyen and Kassegne 2008), control fluid flow in microfluidic networks without a need for mechanical pumps and valves (Bau et al 2003); stir and mix fluids (Bau et al 2001;Yi et al 2002;Xiang and Bau 2003;Qian and Bau 2005;Gleeson and West 2002;West et al 2003;Gleeson et al 2004); and enhance mass transfer next to electrodes' surfaces (Boum and Alemany 1999;Lioubashevski et al 2004;Alemany and Chopart 2007). For a recent review of a few applications of MHD in microfluidics, see Qian and Bau (2009)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretreatment stages [1][2][3], different types of detection systems [4][5][6][7], actuators or measurement and data acquisition systems [8,9] can be easily integrated in a substrate through the fabrication of three-dimensional geometries by means of a multilayer approach. The technique was firstly conceived to develop compact and miniaturized electronic devices because of the symbiotic assembling of fluidics and electronics [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%