2013
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2012.748327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Morita contexts

Abstract: This article concerns mainly on various ring properties of Morita contexts. Necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for a general Morita context or a trivial Morita context or a generalized matrix ring over a ring to satisfy a certain ring property which is among being semilocal, semiperfect, left perfect, semiprimary, semipotent, potent, clean, strongly -regular, semiregular, etc. Many known results on a formal triangular matrix ring are extended to a Morita context or a trivial Morita context. Some … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, A, B are strongly π-regular rings by [10,Corollary 3.7]. With the assumption that MN, NM are nilpotent ideals of A and B respectively, we infer that R is strongly π-regular by [29,Theorem 3.5]. Hence J(R) is nil, and so R is strongly nil-clean by Theorem 2.7.…”
Section: Canonically M/m 0 Is An A/j(a) B/j(b) -Bimodule and N/n 0 mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, A, B are strongly π-regular rings by [10,Corollary 3.7]. With the assumption that MN, NM are nilpotent ideals of A and B respectively, we infer that R is strongly π-regular by [29,Theorem 3.5]. Hence J(R) is nil, and so R is strongly nil-clean by Theorem 2.7.…”
Section: Canonically M/m 0 Is An A/j(a) B/j(b) -Bimodule and N/n 0 mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In [10], generalized matrix ring K s (R) over a ring R is defined and investigated in detail. Addition in K s (R) is componentwise and multiplication is given by…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When s = 1, K 1 (R) is just the matrix ring M 2 (R), but K s (R) can be significantly different from M 2 (R). In fact, for a local ring R and s ∈ C(R), K s (R) ∼ = K 1 (R) iff s ∈ U(R) (see [6,Lemma 3 and Corollary 2] and [12,Corollary 4.10]). The reason for conducting this work is simple: many new families of strongly clean rings can be constructed through K s (R).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%