2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/3920524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Na-Montmorillonite–Polyamide Fiber/Polypropylene Hybrid Composite Prepared by Reactive Melt Mixing

Abstract: Hybrid composites of polypropylene (PP)/sodium montmorillonite (Na-MMT)/short polyamide fibers (PAfs) were prepared by reactive melt mixing in a Brabender plastograph. To enhance filler interactions within polypropylene, a functionalizing agent (FA) and a coupling agent were added to the Na-MMT and PAfs, respectively. An organic peroxide/sulfur mixture and tetramethylthiuram disulfide as an activator for sulfur were used to functionalize Na-MMT; on the other hand, the PAfs surface was treated using stearic aci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Tm is the melting temperature of PP, Tmo is the equilibrium melting temperature of PP, σe is the surface‐free energy of the polymer, normalΔHfo is the standard enthalpy of melting, and Lc is the lamellar thickness. Literature values are as follows: of normalΔHfo = 207.33 J/g, σe = (0.1 J/m 2 ), and Tmo = 187.5°C is used for the calculation 45 . The influence of nanoparticles on the thickness of crystalline lamellae of PP was presented in Table 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Tm is the melting temperature of PP, Tmo is the equilibrium melting temperature of PP, σe is the surface‐free energy of the polymer, normalΔHfo is the standard enthalpy of melting, and Lc is the lamellar thickness. Literature values are as follows: of normalΔHfo = 207.33 J/g, σe = (0.1 J/m 2 ), and Tmo = 187.5°C is used for the calculation 45 . The influence of nanoparticles on the thickness of crystalline lamellae of PP was presented in Table 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T A B L E 5 Crystallinity ratio (X c %) obtained from differential scanning calorimetry and Raman spectroscopy (±1%) values are as follows: of ΔH o f = 207.33 J/g, σ e = (0.1 J/ m 2 ), and T o m = 187.5 C is used for the calculation. 45 The influence of nanoparticles on the thickness of crystalline lamellae of PP was presented in Table 7. Lamellar thickness is calculated from the onset, peak, and end temperature of the melting curve, and the results shows that the inclusion of nanofillers does not contribute to lamellar thickness.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are the literary values: The values of ΔH o f = 207.33 J/g, σ e =0.1 J/m2, and T o m =187.5 C were used in the calculations. [19] Using the universal testing equipment Tinius Olsen, the effect of nanofillers on the mechanical quality of microporous PP was examined (ASTM-D-638 methodstrain from position). The dimensions of the samples were: 10 cm length, 1 cm width and ⁓35 μm thickness.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are the literary values: The values of ΔHfo= 207.33 J/g, σnormale =0.1 J/m2, and Tnormalmnormalo =187.5°C were used in the calculations. [ 19 ]…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed from the SEM micrograph, the fabricated composite blend shows a very rough surface that is represented by the black dotted ring of which we can predict the blending capabilities of PLA and PHA. 23,49,50 The red dotted ring in this image shows regions where intercalated MMT can blend with the polymer composite. Also, intercalated MMT particles cannot be visibly seen as particles, however, images taken in multiple regions of the composite let us visibly observe slightly darker (red dotted ring) regions that have been coated with gold to make it enhance visibility in these regions as intercalated MMT requires a higher contrast and resolution.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%