1994
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(94)90188-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of NiO/Ni(100) structural changes under the influence of ion irradiation at different temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
19
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 illustrates that once oxygen has been adsorbed it causes a marked reduction of the signal located at 16 eV and a slight increase of the work function (C0.3 eV). The spectrum is still dominated by the RI C AN process, which is in agreement with spectra previously published by Morgner et al 11,13 In our series of experiments, we also studied the surface work function by exposing Ni to 5-300 L of oxygen at 600 K (not shown). The surface work function reached a maximum of C0.6 eV for <10 L and decreased continuously down to 0.2 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Figure 1 illustrates that once oxygen has been adsorbed it causes a marked reduction of the signal located at 16 eV and a slight increase of the work function (C0.3 eV). The spectrum is still dominated by the RI C AN process, which is in agreement with spectra previously published by Morgner et al 11,13 In our series of experiments, we also studied the surface work function by exposing Ni to 5-300 L of oxygen at 600 K (not shown). The surface work function reached a maximum of C0.6 eV for <10 L and decreased continuously down to 0.2 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A very similar tendency has been observed in the MAES spectra during initial oxidation of Ni(1 0 0) [25]. The difference in the total emission yield gives rise to the contrast of the MEEM image.…”
Section: Maes and Meemsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The oxidation of Ni is regarded as a typical surface reaction, and it has been extensively studied using several methods that include low energy electron diffraction (LEED) [17][18][19][20], Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) [17,18], photoemission spectroscopy (XPS and UPS) [21][22][23], metastable-atom electron spectroscopy (MAES) [24,25], high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HREELS) [23,26,27], and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [28,29], etc. According to the standard model proposed by Holloway and Hudson [17], the oxidation at 300 K proceeds in three steps: chemisorption, nucleation and lateral growth of oxide, and in-depth growth of oxide (see Section 4 for details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,24 Both spectra display a close similarity to those for CoO (Fig. 3) and NiO 22 (featuring five structures denoted by (1)- (5) in Refs 20 and 24). The main characteristics of the spectra can be summarized as follows: as in the present results, the Co 3d-derived bands (A and B in our notation) are strongly suppressed in MIES relative to the O 2p-derived structures C and D. Also, as in the present MIES results, peak E appears considerably enhanced compared to that in UPS.…”
Section: Interaction Of Co With Omentioning
confidence: 50%