E89T he term "education" has many meanings, although its gestalt shows little effect on the performance of clinicians or the outcomes of health care. This lack of effect is especially true in continuing medical education (CME), where education often implies a large, group-based session held in a hotel or conference setting. The American Medical Association defines CME as "any and all ways by which physicians learn and maintain their competence" -clearly a more fulsome construct than attending a short course.
1In this paper, we describe educational interventions that are designed to promote the incorporation of best evidence into the practices of health professionals. We address a theoretic basis for the learning and education of physicians (making reference mainly to physicians because most studies in this area have involved physicians). We also provide an outline of effective large-group methods, describe innovations in formal education that use high-tech (and low-tech) strategies and discuss future trends in CME.
What are the purposes of education?Why do health care professionals learn? They are driven by many external forces. These forces include the explosion of knowledge, interest in CME among specialty societies, the use of CME "credits" to document the maintenance of knowledge and skills, and a large interest in CME by pharmaceutical and other commercial interests that recognize it as a means of influencing the practices of physicians. Of course, many internal forces are at work as well, including an innate sense of professionalism on the part of most health care workers.The question of how physicians learn is equally complex. Fox and his colleagues asked over 300 North American physicians what practices they had changed and what forces had driven that change.2 The forces for change described by the physicians were varied. Whereas some changes had arisen from traditional educational experiences, many more resulted from intrapersonal factors (e.g., a recent personal experience) or from changing demographics (e.g., aging or changing populations and changes in the demands of patients). The changes varied from small adjustments or accommodations (e.g., adding to a regimen a new drug within a class of drugs already known and prescribed) to much larger "redirections," such as adopting an entirely new method of practice.In another approach to understanding how physicians learn, Schon describes the internal process of learning and reflection. He suggests that a potent mechanism of learning is secondary to self-appraisal and awareness built from clinical experiences and leads to a building of a new and expanded competency or "zone of mastery," 3 Candy's description of the traits of the self-directed learner is another model for learning. 4 These traits include discipline and motivation, analytic abilities, an ability to reflect and be self-aware, curiosity, openness and flexibility, independence and self-sufficiency, well-developed information-seeking and retrieval skills, and good general learning skills. Clearly...