1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1967.tb08806.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Pyrimidine Dimers in Mammalian Cells Surviving Low Doses of Ultraviolet Radiation*

Abstract: Ultraviolet-induced pyrimidine dimers were not found to be excised from the DNA of Chinese hamster cells in small oligonucleotides. At doses whereby many cells survive the radiation, the dimers were still associated with the large polynucleotides even after 48 hr of postirradiation incubation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no detectable excision of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in mouse and hamster cells, and presumably rodent cells in general (14,24,25). If the decrease in U1-U5 snRNA synthesis observed in human cells within 2 h after UV irradiation were somehow related to the removal of pyrimidine dimers, one might not expect to see it in mouse cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no detectable excision of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in mouse and hamster cells, and presumably rodent cells in general (14,24,25). If the decrease in U1-U5 snRNA synthesis observed in human cells within 2 h after UV irradiation were somehow related to the removal of pyrimidine dimers, one might not expect to see it in mouse cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…photoproducts in DNA. Selective release of pyrimidine dimers from u.v.-irradiated Chinese hamster cells into acid-soluble products has not been demonstrated (table 1; Trosko, Chu andCarrier 1965, Trosko andKasschau 1967). On the basis of the arguments presented above, we conclude that most of the products we detected were due to degradation of DNA subsequent to the release of nucleolytic enzymes from killed cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…light (Boyce and Howard-Flanders 1964, Aoki, Boyce and HowardFlanders 1966, Clark, Chamberlain, Boyce and Howard-Flanders 1966, or x-rays (McGrath, Williams andSchwartzendruber 1966, Pollard andWeller 1968). In contrast, irradiated mammalian cells undergo very little DNA degradation (Cleaver 1968, Little 1968, Painter 1968, Watanabe and Okada 1968. In neither bacteria nor mammalian cells has the nature of these degradation products been extensively studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early work from Dick Setlow's laboratory and in our laboratory suggested that permanently established mouse and hamster cells in culture were very defective in repair [Klimek, 1966;Painter and Cleaver, 1969;Trosko et al, 1965;Trosko and Kasschau, 1967]. Despite these early studies, it proved possible to develop many UV-sensitive mutants of hamster cells [Thompson et al, 1980], showing they had a functional NER system.…”
Section: Are Rodent Cells Really Repair-deficient?mentioning
confidence: 99%