2015 International Conference on Futuristic Trends on Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ablaze.2015.7154944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of robust feature extraction techniques for speech recognition system

Abstract: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system gives better result in restricted conditions but under noisy conditions it does not perform well. The main aim of ASR research work is that a machine must recognize the entire input raw signal with 100% accuracy in real time. In the presence of noise, audiovisual features play a vital role in ASR systems. This paper summarizes various robust feature extraction techniques to study the performance of raw speech signal in automatic speech recognition. We also overview som… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LPCCs, which are the coefficients of the Fourier transform representation of the log magnitude of the spectrum, are typically used instead of the original predictor coefficients since they are considered more robust for audio classification purposes. 45 The LPCCs, C , for each frame, m , were calculated from the linear predictor coefficients, a , according to equation (4) 46…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LPCCs, which are the coefficients of the Fourier transform representation of the log magnitude of the spectrum, are typically used instead of the original predictor coefficients since they are considered more robust for audio classification purposes. 45 The LPCCs, C , for each frame, m , were calculated from the linear predictor coefficients, a , according to equation (4) 46…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have been conducted to compare ASR features extraction techniques [1][2] [3][4][5] [6]. Most of this research has been focused on the advantages and disadvantages of each extraction method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it relies on auto-correlaton analysis, MFCC shares the trait with LPC that it is not noise robust [13, p. 358]; although there are many MFCC variants, each with their own improvements and compromises [14]. Other feature extraction techniques include Perceptual Linear Predictive Coefficients (PLP), which are often used in conjunction with RASTA for improved performance; Wavelet-based features; and Linear Predictive Cepstral Coefficients (LPCC), an addition to LPC [13][14][15][16]. The work performed in [3, p.83] contrasts LPCC and MFCC, demonstrating that LPCC generally results in lower accuracy but has a faster computation rate while MFCC is slower to compute, but often results in improved recognition accuracy.…”
Section: Feature Extraction Techniques Used In Asr Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%