AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-0342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions on an Axisymmetric Body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visualization tests for this nose was performed by the author for the present paper, and shows subtle errors in the shock shape predicted by Equation (2) comparing to that measured from the Schlieren tests. For a high supersonic speed of M=5.05, Figure 11 shows a good performance for Equation (2) in predicting the shock shape comparing to the experimental data of reference 6. Note that the shock lies closer to the body as the free stream Mach number increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The visualization tests for this nose was performed by the author for the present paper, and shows subtle errors in the shock shape predicted by Equation (2) comparing to that measured from the Schlieren tests. For a high supersonic speed of M=5.05, Figure 11 shows a good performance for Equation (2) in predicting the shock shape comparing to the experimental data of reference 6. Note that the shock lies closer to the body as the free stream Mach number increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Theoretically, the closer be R² to the unity, the better would be the estimation of regression [25]. The regression coefficient, R², and the adjusted regression coefficient, Radj² [25], for each coefficient in Equation (2) have been calculated and shown in Table 1.…”
Section: The Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations