1980
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3950(80)90158-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of structure formation during phase transitions in poly-p-phenyleneterephthalamide solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of any orientation, both a flexible polymer and a stiff polymer can form spherulites [34,35]. In the presence of orientation (with the minimum necessary strength and application time of an externally imposed orientational field being different for each case), both stiff polymers [34,35] and the highly flexible polyethylene can develop fibrillar morphology; the comparison can also be extended to include shish-kebab and row nucleation type of morphologies [34][35][36][37][38]. The main difference between the flexible and lyotropic behavior, at least at size scales of a few hundred angstrom or higher, pertains to the magnitude of the orienting field necessary to create a long-range axial orientation and the lifetime of that orientation in case the orienting field is turned off while the viscosity of the solidifying system is finite.…”
Section: Of Ref 7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of any orientation, both a flexible polymer and a stiff polymer can form spherulites [34,35]. In the presence of orientation (with the minimum necessary strength and application time of an externally imposed orientational field being different for each case), both stiff polymers [34,35] and the highly flexible polyethylene can develop fibrillar morphology; the comparison can also be extended to include shish-kebab and row nucleation type of morphologies [34][35][36][37][38]. The main difference between the flexible and lyotropic behavior, at least at size scales of a few hundred angstrom or higher, pertains to the magnitude of the orienting field necessary to create a long-range axial orientation and the lifetime of that orientation in case the orienting field is turned off while the viscosity of the solidifying system is finite.…”
Section: Of Ref 7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison applies to the melt, reversible gel, and solution starting states for flexible polymers and to reversible gel and solution starting states for lyotropic polymers. In the absence of any orientation, both a flexible polymer and a stiff polymer can form spherulites [34,35]. In the presence of orientation (with the minimum necessary strength and application time of an externally imposed orientational field being different for each case), both stiff polymers [34,35] and the highly flexible polyethylene can develop fibrillar morphology; the comparison can also be extended to include shish-kebab and row nucleation type of morphologies [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Of Ref 7)mentioning
confidence: 99%