1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00177.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of subcellular localization of membrane‐bound choline acetyltransferase in Drosophila central nervous system and its association with membranes

Abstract: Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), the enzyme which catalyses the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, exists in a soluble and membrane‐bound form in cholinergic nerve terminals of different animal species. This study was performed on the enzyme present in Drosophila central nervous system. We show that the two forms of the enzyme have the same apparent molecular weight (75 kDa) when analysed by immunoblotting using an antibody we raised against the recombinant enzyme. According to different auth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In Drosophila melanogaster, ChAT exists in cholinergic nerve terminals in at least two forms; a soluble and membrane-bound form that exhibit the same apparent molecular weight (75 kDa). 35 It should be noted that purification of locust ChAT results in a band at 65 kDa 45 very similar to that of reported in the spider Cupiennius salei. 46 The main reason that explains such difference may be that different forms of the enzyme exist.…”
Section: Identification and Tissue Distributions Of Choline Acetyltrasupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In Drosophila melanogaster, ChAT exists in cholinergic nerve terminals in at least two forms; a soluble and membrane-bound form that exhibit the same apparent molecular weight (75 kDa). 35 It should be noted that purification of locust ChAT results in a band at 65 kDa 45 very similar to that of reported in the spider Cupiennius salei. 46 The main reason that explains such difference may be that different forms of the enzyme exist.…”
Section: Identification and Tissue Distributions Of Choline Acetyltrasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Cholinergic neurons can be detected by (1) using antibodies against ChAT, (2) in situ hybridization to detect the transcript and (3) staining for a reporter gene fused to the regulatory sequence of the ChAT gene. [35][36][37] In this case, ChAT has been first identified in the larval neuropil, including the larval antennal and optic lobes and in the gustatory target regions, which appeared to be due to the terminals of cholinergic afferents. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In Drosophila melanogaster, ChAT exists in cholinergic nerve terminals in at least two forms; a soluble and membrane-bound form that exhibit the same apparent molecular weight (75 kDa).…”
Section: Identification and Tissue Distributions Of Choline Acetyltramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major difference between Drosophila and human, however, is that the M transcript that encodes the 82-kDa form of human ChAT also encodes 69-kDa ChAT from a second translation initiation site. It appears, from the data that exist, that Drosophila ChAT is produced as a single 75-kDa protein (32). To date, there is no evidence to indicate that 82-kDa human ChAT is proteolytically cleaved to generate 69-kDa ChAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The means by which ChAT binds nonionically to membranes has not been elucidated; it does not have obvious hydrophobic domains for association with the lipid bilayer, and the presence of covalent modifications such as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol linkage have been controversial (16 -18). Eder-Colli and colleagues (19) reported recently that in Drosophila neurons amphiphilic ChAT had properties of a peripheral membrane protein and was removed from plasma membranes by alkaline carbonate (1 g) of purified wild-type or S440A-ChAT were phosphorylated in vitro using PKC, as described under "Experimental Procedures." At varying times up to 1 h, samples were removed from incubation and prepared for analysis by SDS-PAGE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%