2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the 27-day variations of the galactic cosmic ray intensity and anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 presents for the first NMs and for all combining NMs by GSM. We confirm our previous finding [6] that near the solar minimum the amplitudes of the 27-day variations of the 2D GCR anisotropy determined using GSM basically do not differ from the amplitudes found by harmonic analysis for an individual NM with cut-off rigidity < 5 GV. Figure 1 shows that this feature is kept for the whole solar cycle and solar magnetic cycle.…”
Section: Long Term Changes Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 presents for the first NMs and for all combining NMs by GSM. We confirm our previous finding [6] that near the solar minimum the amplitudes of the 27-day variations of the 2D GCR anisotropy determined using GSM basically do not differ from the amplitudes found by harmonic analysis for an individual NM with cut-off rigidity < 5 GV. Figure 1 shows that this feature is kept for the whole solar cycle and solar magnetic cycle.…”
Section: Long Term Changes Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The time lines of the 27-day variation of the 2D GCR anisotropy confirm that the average amplitude in the minimum epoch of solar activity is polarity dependent, as it is expected from the drift theory. The amplitude in the negative polarity epochs is less as we had shown before [6]. The feeble 11-year variation connected with solar cycle and strong 22-year pattern connected with solar magnetic cycle is visible in the 27-day variation of the 2D anisotropy for 1965-2014.…”
Section: Long Term Changes Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 49%
“…3-D models developed by Kota and Jokipii (1983; show that in the global modulation model of GCR , the large-scale structure is controlled by drift effects in conjunction with diffusion, convection and energy change, but the small-scale structure is caused by diffusive effects in the transient and corotating structures. Alania, Gil and Modzelewska (2008a), Gil, Alania and Modzelewska (2008) demonstrated that for the polarity dependent amplitudes of the 27-day variations of the GCR intensity are responsible, among the equally important drift effects, the heliolongitudinally dependent solar wind velocity with various ranges in the A>0 and A<0 polarity epochs. We showed (Alania, Modzelewska and Wawrzynczak, 2010) that to explain features of the 27-day variation of the GCR intensity by three dimensional (3-D) modelling, there should be taken into account a consistent, divergence-free IMF derived from Maxwell's equations with the heliolongitudinally dependent solar wind velocity reproducing in situ observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It partially is connected with the complexity of the reliable revealing of the 27-day variation of the GCR anisotropy by means of small amplitudes of the diurnal variations of GCR (< 0.3%, measured by NMs), and with a large dispersion of the amplitudes of diurnal variation comparable with the accuracy of hourly data of NMs. In papers Alania et al, [7], [18] studied the 27-day variation of the 2D GCR anisotropy in the ecliptic plane. They demonstrated that the average amplitude in the minimum epoch of solar activity is polarity dependent, as it is expected from the drift theory.…”
Section: -Day Wave In Gcr Anisotropy Near the Solar Minimum 23/24: mentioning
confidence: 99%