Study of the biaxial fatigue behaviour and overloads on S355 low carbon steel

Cruces, Alejandro S.; Mokhtarishirazabad, Mehdi; Moreno, B.; Zanganeh, M.; López-Crespo, P.

doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105466

Cited by 19 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…The experimental results were discussed in relation to the results presented by de Jesus et al 2 and Adedipe et al 11 . Biaxial and multiaxial fatigue loading of S355 steel is studied in Cruces et al 12 and Dantas et al 13 The knowledge of fatigue data in the region of VHCF is important as fatigue fracture often occurs after the conventional criterion of N f = 10 7 cycles. This behavior often occurs in the cases of high-strength and structural steels.…”

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of high‐ and low‐frequency fatigue properties of structural steels S355J0 and S355J2

Klusák

Horník

Lesiuk

et al. 2021

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper brings results of high-cycle fatigue and very-high-cycle fatigue tests of the steel S355 tested during low-and high-frequency loading. Two grades of structural steel (S355J0 and S355J2) were tested to gain fatigue properties that serve as inputs to reliable finite element calculations of cyclically loaded structures. Experimental measurements of both steel grades were performed on low-frequency hydraulic and high-frequency ultrasonic fatigue testing systems. Both low-and high-frequency loading showed higher lifetime for the grade S355J2. The difference between the two studied steel grades was more apparent during low-frequency loading. The significant difference between the results of low-and high-frequency loading tests can be explained by the fact that the resistance to plastic deformation increases with an increasing rate of deformation. Fracture surfaces were studied by electron microscopy, where they exhibited both surface and internal crack initiation.

show abstract

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of high‐ and low‐frequency fatigue properties of structural steels S355J0 and S355J2

Klusák

Horník

Lesiuk

et al. 2021

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it would be recommended to include a comparison with actual experimental data (measured on real specimens). There are few experimental studies that examine the impact of multiaxial loading on fatigue life, for example, in the following tests: (a) plain cylindrical specimens under cyclic tension‐compression loading with cyclic torsion 39,40 ; (b) plain tubular specimens under cyclic axial loading with inner pressure 41 ; (c) notched round bars under combined bending and torsion 42 ; (d) thin‐walled hollow cylinders with a notch under proportional and non‐proportional cyclic tension‐compression‐torsion loadings 43 ; and (e) hollow cylinders with a central hole under cyclic uniaxial and biaxial loading 44 . The relevant experiments found in the literature (a) concern mostly the identification of the orientation of the growth of the initiated surface crack and its subsequent growth rate, and (b) lack knowledge with regard to the friction between the surfaces of the initiated crack.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The relevant experiments found in the literature (a) concern mostly the identification of the orientation of the growth of the initiated surface crack and its subsequent growth rate, and (b) lack knowledge with regard to the friction between the surfaces of the initiated crack. Cruces et al 44 estimated the factors KI and KII of the cracks initiated in their tests by making use of experimentally measured crack tip openings and sliding displacements. Here, the initiated cracks are small and imbedded in fully plastic stress–strain fields.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mixed‐mode I/II stress intensity factors of a biaxially loaded plate with a central slant frictional crack: An analytical comprehensive solution

Hammouda

2023

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work presents a comprehensive analytical solution for the mixed‐mode I/II stress intensity factor of a biaxially loaded plate that has a centrally straight inclined crack with frictional surfaces. The solution addresses every possible combination of coefficient of friction, biaxial ratio, crack length, and angle. The present results agree with the available corresponding finite element solutions. For the tension‐compression and compression‐tension biaxial loading, crack angles are recognized to achieve pure mode I, pure mode II, and mixed‐mode crack tip deformation in terms of stress biaxiality and friction coefficient. In the compression‐compression biaxial loading, only mode II crack tip deformation is operative. The ranges of crack angles necessary to produce dormant cracks are determined for the biaxial loading patterns, where a compressive stress is involved, as a function of the biaxial ratio and friction coefficient. It is possible to apply the present solution to cracked plates with two‐dimensional stresses that include a shear stress.

show abstract

“…As a low carbon structural steel, S355 steel is widely used not only in vehicles, bridges, ships, edifices, etc (Wang et al , 2013; Chaves, 2014) but also in offshore platforms because of its good weldability and high ductility (Cruces et al , 2020), which are exposed to abrasion wear by heavy sand particles in seawater (Momber and Marquardt, 2018; Momber et al , 2015). Corrosive wear becomes more severe in oxygen-rich splash zone (Melchers et al , 2007), the total mass loss in the corrosive wear process is greater than that of corrosion and wear alone (López et al , 2015; López–Ortega et al , 2018), which decreased the mechanical properties such as strength, ductility and impact strength to loss of material and ultimate failure (Popoola et al , 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corrosive wear and electrochemical corrosion performances of arc sprayed Al coating in 3.5% NaCl solution

Huang

Dejun

2021

ACMM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of load and speed on the corrosive wear performance of Al coating in 3.5% NaCl solution, which provided an experimental reference for the anti-corrosion engineering on offshore platforms. Design/methodology/approach A layer of Al coating was prepared on S355 steel using an arc spraying. The corrosive wear test was carried out with CFT–1 type surface property tester. The effects of load and speed on the corrosive wear performance of Al coating were investigated and the wear mechanism was also discussed. The electrochemical tests were conducted using a CHI660E type electrochemical workstation, the anti-corrosion mechanism was analyzed. Findings The average coefficient of frictions (COFs) of Al coating under loads of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 N are 0.745, 0.847 and 0.423, the wear mechanism is abrasive wear. The average COFs of Al coating at the speeds of 200, 400 and 600 rpm are 0.745, 0.878 and 0.617, respectively, the wear mechanism at the speeds of 200 and 400 rpm are abrasive wear, while that at the speed of 600 rpm is abrasive wear and fatigue wear. The anti-corrosion mechanism is the isolation of Cl– corrosion and cathodic protection of sacrificial anode. Originality/value This paper mainly studied corrosive wear and electrochemical corrosion performances of Al coating. This study hereby confirms that this manuscript is the original work and has not been published nor has it been submitted simultaneously elsewhere. This paper further confirms that all authors have checked the manuscript and have agreed to the submission.

show abstract

Study of the biaxial fatigue behaviour and overloads on S355 low carbon steel

Cited by 19 publications

References 61 publications

Comparison of high‐ and low‐frequency fatigue properties of structural steels S355J0 and S355J2

Comparison of high‐ and low‐frequency fatigue properties of structural steels S355J0 and S355J2

Mixed‐mode I/II stress intensity factors of a biaxially loaded plate with a central slant frictional crack: An analytical comprehensive solution

Corrosive wear and electrochemical corrosion performances of arc sprayed Al coating in 3.5% NaCl solution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About