2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the carbon distribution in multi-phase steels using the NanoSIMS 50

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition of the marked area ( Figure 5A) is dominated by ions of MgO. The abundance of carbon can be explained by a high sensitivity of the SIMS technique for the analysis of the carbon (Valle et al, 2006). Also, Figure 5A shows quartz crystals of 1 -2 μm in the chalk (marked by the stippled red line; left image).…”
Section: Chalk Characteristics After the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of the marked area ( Figure 5A) is dominated by ions of MgO. The abundance of carbon can be explained by a high sensitivity of the SIMS technique for the analysis of the carbon (Valle et al, 2006). Also, Figure 5A shows quartz crystals of 1 -2 μm in the chalk (marked by the stippled red line; left image).…”
Section: Chalk Characteristics After the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chamber pressure was 3 × 10 -10 Torr and samples were pre-sputtered to eliminate carbon surface contamination. Note that although the SIMS intensity varies linearly with carbon concentration, 23) the data presented here are not quantitative because any reference sample corresponding to the studied grade was used for calibration. Nevertheless, on each carbon map, the variations of C intensity can be interpreted as relative variations in the local C concentration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and a limiting spatial resolution of 50 nm. 23) High spatial resolution SIMS carbon maps were acquired on samples quenched from 755°C, 790°C and 810°C. The incident Cs + probe energy was 16 keV with a primary ion beam current of 1 pA and a probe size between 50 nm and 150 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local carbon distribution or concentration cannot be obtained by XRD measurements. Alternatively, some researchers have used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Kammouni et al, ; Scott & Drillet, ; Zhang & Kelly, ), atom probe tomography (APT) (Garcia‐Mateo, Caballero, Miller, & Jimenez, ; Peet, Babu, Miller, & Bhadeshia, ), or Nano‐SIMS (Valle, Drillet, Bouaziz, & Migeon, ) to detect the different carbon levels in austenite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%